Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

muriel_volestrangler

(106,108 posts)

8. On the contrary - DNA evidence has been used in several successful appeals

Reply to saras (Reply #7)

Tue Feb 14, 2012, 02:02 PM

Feb 2012

to free someone, in Britain. And it was DNA evidence that was 'new and compelling' that convicted 2 of the Stephen Lawrence killers in the case above.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7946777.stm

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Knox and Sollecito murder acquittals challenged [View all] dipsydoodle Feb 2012 OP

Yep JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #1

I'm not quite sure it's standard operating procedure dipsydoodle Feb 2012 #2

I don't know JustAnotherGen Feb 2012 #6

She's not going back. Renew Deal Feb 2012 #3

The Anglo-American legal system is one of the few that Lydia Leftcoast Feb 2012 #4

The English system has been recently changed to allow it for "new and compelling evidence" muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #5

It would be nice if they allowed new and compelling evidence for the 'guilty' as well saras Feb 2012 #7

On the contrary - DNA evidence has been used in several successful appeals muriel_volestrangler Feb 2012 #8

Good! Darth_Kitten Feb 2012 #9