Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

elleng

(141,926 posts)
2. Good news, they recognize the difficulty of the issue and don't act like bull in china shop.
Mon Jun 24, 2013, 10:43 AM
Jun 2013

From SCOTUSblog:

Here’s the money quote: “The reviewing court must ultimately be satisfied that no workable race-neutral alternatives would produce the educational benefits of diversity.”

The opinion by Kennedy. The Fifth Circuit is vacated and remanded. The holding is because the Fifth Circuit did not hold the university to the demanding burden of strict scrutiny articulated in Grutter and Bakke, its decision affiming the district court’s grant of summary judgment was incorrect.

There is one dissent. It is 7-1. Ginsburg dissents alone. There are separate concurring opinions by Scalia and Thomas. Kagan was recused.

http://projects.nytimes.com/live-dashboard/2013-06-supreme-court-decisions

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court punts on af...»Reply #2