Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Never mind. I misread the ruling. nt onehandle Jun 2013 #1
Why would this be good for us? pnwmom Jun 2013 #8
More corporate protections DainBramaged Jun 2013 #2
Not necessarily ... Myrina Jun 2013 #3
Generics are not exact copies DainBramaged Jun 2013 #4
I understand that, but Myrina Jun 2013 #5
sounds logical DainBramaged Jun 2013 #6
This case was a federal case not a state case. former9thward Jun 2013 #11
That's because there's an incorrect assumption that "inactive" ingredients never matter pnwmom Jun 2013 #9
. blkmusclmachine Jun 2013 #7
Here is the actual opinion happyslug Jun 2013 #10
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court Says No To ...»Reply #6