Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

merrily

(45,251 posts)
39. The story raises several issues.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 07:14 AM
Jun 2013

One, the IRS was using improper criteria. It does not matter if it was using improper criteria for both the right and left. The criteria were improper.

Not for profit organization are allowed to educate the public about political issues.



501(c)(4) organizations may inform the public on controversial subjects and attempt to influence legislation relevant to its program[38] and, unlike 501(c)(3) organizations, they may also participate in political campaigns and elections, as long as its primary activity is the promotion of social welfare.[39] The tax exemption for 501(c)(4) organizations applies to most of their operations, but contributions may be subject to gift tax, and income spent on political activities - generally the advocacy of a particular candidate in an election - is taxable.[40] An "action" organization generally qualifies as a 501(c)(4) organization.[41] An "action" organization is one whose activities substantially include, or are exclusively,[42] direct lobbying or grass roots lobbying related to advocacy for or against legislation or proposing, supporting, or opposing legislation that is related to its purpose.[43] A 501(c)(4) organization may directly or indirectly support or oppose a candidate for public office as long as such activities are not a substantial amount of its activities.[32][44]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501%28c%29_organization#501.28c.29.284.29

Two, Congress was lied to on more than one occasion when it tried to perform its oversight function.

Three, the WH gave the public the impression that the Acting Head of the IRS had been required to resign over this, when in fact, his so called resignation was to be effective on the date he was already set to retire.

Four, despite all the brouhaha, the IRS continued to use improper criteria until two weeks ago.

But, that all gets lost over whether the IRS treated the left as unlawfully as it treated the right.

Very discouraging.
Of course this won't get the same play in the M$M, cause the initial uproar was "juicier".Rating$$$. Tarheel_Dem Jun 2013 #1
It won't get any outrage here. Buzz Clik Jun 2013 #4
The "Occupy" angle will get some play, in terms of mean old Obama picking on them nt geek tragedy Jun 2013 #12
And yet we only heard about the tea party cases. NutmegYankee Jun 2013 #2
Who is doing the most cheating, and the most whining? Berlum Jun 2013 #3
Issa is having a hissy fit right now wordpix Jun 2013 #33
think progress article alp227 Jun 2013 #5
You wanna know why they were being checked? Its because many of them actually are political groups cstanleytech Jun 2013 #6
Exactly.... paleotn Jun 2013 #15
+1000, let's see Issa scream about the IRS preventing tax fraud across the board, I can't wait wordpix Jun 2013 #34
Well that pops Fux New's HUGH scandal......... Grassy Knoll Jun 2013 #7
you think that will stop them? NewJeffCT Jun 2013 #10
Did I miss a brilliant new term? Daemonaquila Jun 2013 #20
Yep, it really is. n/t TDale313 Jun 2013 #26
I think so, too wordpix Jun 2013 #35
Funny that ALL we heard about was "FASCIST OBAMA IRS IS HARRASSING OUR TEA PARTY!!" nt 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #8
But I thought he was a socialist.... paleotn Jun 2013 #13
I don't think the Tea Party brain is wired correctly 99th_Monkey Jun 2013 #16
Wait, "brain?" Daemonaquila Jun 2013 #19
Game over tea party! obama2terms Jun 2013 #9
Waiting for the DUers who claimed "the federal government was using the IRS to harass geek tragedy Jun 2013 #11
I'm waiting for all the jabberwockys on Faux to eat their words. Boomerproud Jun 2013 #25
Quotation marks suggest you are quoting somebody. hay rick Jun 2013 #45
Eh, the search function will provide those. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #46
Any occupy group is going to be way less partisan than any Teaparty group. /nt Ash_F Jun 2013 #14
Maybe Occupy is more ethical and smarter LeftInTX Jun 2013 #21
First come first examined Luschnig Jun 2013 #17
Very important - let's spread this everywhere! Daemonaquila Jun 2013 #18
Serves the "Tea Party" interests to only tell half the truth... jimlup Jun 2013 #22
I'm not sure I'd call that "targetting". JoeyT Jun 2013 #23
But nobody else whines like a tea-bagger ThoughtCriminal Jun 2013 #24
Why didn't they say this from day one? rucky Jun 2013 #27
Well of course 'progressive', 'occupy' and 'Israel' were reasonable. Kablooie Jun 2013 #28
Kick n/t Tx4obama Jun 2013 #29
New York Times Douglas Carpenter Jun 2013 #30
That's terrible Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #31
LOL. Doing a proper enforcement job has now been declared "targeting" by the corporate/state media PSPS Jun 2013 #32
Of course. That is why the only group denied tax exempt status was a progressive org. nt SunSeeker Jun 2013 #36
you wanna know something lcordero2 Jun 2013 #37
Seriously ... we're JUST hearing about this NOW ... BECAAAAAUSE?!? brett_jv Jun 2013 #38
The delay in the truth coming out is may be because the IRS Eric J in MN Jun 2013 #41
The story raises several issues. merrily Jun 2013 #39
It's not even a scandal if it wasn't based on viewpoint discrimination. geek tragedy Jun 2013 #42
BS Lugal Zaggesi Jun 2013 #44
On NPR this morning, the teaser for this story said, "IRS Targetting More Extreme" Eric J in MN Jun 2013 #40
Time to eliminate this 501(4)(c) section question everything Jun 2013 #43
From what I see, the story is that Issa commissioned a politically biased audit Thor_MN Jun 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»REVEALED: The IRS Targete...»Reply #39