Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: REVEALED: The IRS Targeted Groups Containing 'Tea Party,' 'Progressive,' 'Occupy,' And 'Israel' [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)39. The story raises several issues.
One, the IRS was using improper criteria. It does not matter if it was using improper criteria for both the right and left. The criteria were improper.
Not for profit organization are allowed to educate the public about political issues.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/501%28c%29_organization#501.28c.29.284.29
501(c)(4) organizations may inform the public on controversial subjects and attempt to influence legislation relevant to its program[38] and, unlike 501(c)(3) organizations, they may also participate in political campaigns and elections, as long as its primary activity is the promotion of social welfare.[39] The tax exemption for 501(c)(4) organizations applies to most of their operations, but contributions may be subject to gift tax, and income spent on political activities - generally the advocacy of a particular candidate in an election - is taxable.[40] An "action" organization generally qualifies as a 501(c)(4) organization.[41] An "action" organization is one whose activities substantially include, or are exclusively,[42] direct lobbying or grass roots lobbying related to advocacy for or against legislation or proposing, supporting, or opposing legislation that is related to its purpose.[43] A 501(c)(4) organization may directly or indirectly support or oppose a candidate for public office as long as such activities are not a substantial amount of its activities.[32][44]
Two, Congress was lied to on more than one occasion when it tried to perform its oversight function.
Three, the WH gave the public the impression that the Acting Head of the IRS had been required to resign over this, when in fact, his so called resignation was to be effective on the date he was already set to retire.
Four, despite all the brouhaha, the IRS continued to use improper criteria until two weeks ago.
But, that all gets lost over whether the IRS treated the left as unlawfully as it treated the right.
Very discouraging.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
REVEALED: The IRS Targeted Groups Containing 'Tea Party,' 'Progressive,' 'Occupy,' And 'Israel' [View all]
tpsbmam
Jun 2013
OP
Of course this won't get the same play in the M$M, cause the initial uproar was "juicier".Rating$$$.
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#1
The "Occupy" angle will get some play, in terms of mean old Obama picking on them nt
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#12
You wanna know why they were being checked? Its because many of them actually are political groups
cstanleytech
Jun 2013
#6
+1000, let's see Issa scream about the IRS preventing tax fraud across the board, I can't wait
wordpix
Jun 2013
#34
Funny that ALL we heard about was "FASCIST OBAMA IRS IS HARRASSING OUR TEA PARTY!!" nt
99th_Monkey
Jun 2013
#8
Waiting for the DUers who claimed "the federal government was using the IRS to harass
geek tragedy
Jun 2013
#11
LOL. Doing a proper enforcement job has now been declared "targeting" by the corporate/state media
PSPS
Jun 2013
#32
Of course. That is why the only group denied tax exempt status was a progressive org. nt
SunSeeker
Jun 2013
#36
On NPR this morning, the teaser for this story said, "IRS Targetting More Extreme"
Eric J in MN
Jun 2013
#40
From what I see, the story is that Issa commissioned a politically biased audit
Thor_MN
Jun 2013
#47