Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Witness Makes Key Admission That He Never Saw Trayvon Martin Throw A Punch At Zimmerman [View all]Bjorn Against
(12,041 posts)27. That would be true if the prosecution were trying to put doubt in the minds of jurors
That is not their strategy however, instead they fully acknowledge Zimmerman killed Martin, there is no doubt on that point. Killing another person is illegal in most cases, and in the cases where it is justified the burden is on the defendent to prove it was justified. The state only has to prove Zimmerman killed Martin, the burden is on Zimmerman to prove it was self defense.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Witness Makes Key Admission That He Never Saw Trayvon Martin Throw A Punch At Zimmerman [View all]
kpete
Jun 2013
OP
I keep hoping the jury realized it was bullying the witness, plain and simple and that it was
appleannie1
Jun 2013
#24
After the disastrous Rachel Jeantel testimony now my prediction swings from acquittal to Hung Jury.
alp227
Jun 2013
#2
I want to know why since Zimmy was trained in MMA, he keeps assuming it was TM who was doing that
uppityperson
Jun 2013
#7
He's very articulate and precise. He is allowed to have discrepencies in his testimony.
kelliekat44
Jun 2013
#14
That would be true if the prosecution were trying to put doubt in the minds of jurors
Bjorn Against
Jun 2013
#27