Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Edward Snowden In 2009: Leakers Should Be 'Shot In The Balls' [View all]Pterodactyl
(1,687 posts)105. Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I have to wonder how evolved this guy's views on women are, based on some of his comments.
MADem
Jun 2013
#72
I guess he gave his balls up and is not worried about getting shot in the balls.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#4
The day we found out he snuck off to Hong Kong was the day he has no ball to shoot at!
George II
Jun 2013
#26
Galraedia we already have a thread on this story that You already posted on in General Discussion.
avaistheone1
Jun 2013
#5
Gives money to a slavery apologist and neo-confederate and thinks he is a champion of liberty
Major Nikon
Jun 2013
#12
So if we let you shoot Snowden in the balls can we look into the information on domestic spying?
last1standing
Jun 2013
#11
The two aren't mutually exclusive you know. There's a pro & con side to every issue. Snowden is no
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#18
Alright, let's compromise. Let's look into both Snowden AND what he said.
last1standing
Jun 2013
#23
I'm fine with not agreeing on how Snowden's personal information is being uncovered.
last1standing
Jun 2013
#76
We're coming in from different angles but it looks like we agree on the basics.
last1standing
Jun 2013
#80
"the White House is allowing the NSA and other groups to use his past to personally smear him"?
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#41
You definitely misunderstood. I was making the point that the thought of Obama directing some....
Tarheel_Dem
Jun 2013
#92
Aha! I suspect some of us knew something like that (maybe not so graphic) already.
George II
Jun 2013
#24
Probably none. The media is having a field day--he's better than the "best" Kardashian. nt
MADem
Jun 2013
#50
Maybe the US should stop violating the sovereignty of country with which it is huge a trade partner?
Ash_F
Jun 2013
#58
This crap isn't what its about. Get off the Snowden Circus bandwagon! It's the invasion of privacy
marble falls
Jun 2013
#54
Maybe thats why he cut and run. Maybe "shot in the balls" is policy and not just his opinion.
marble falls
Jun 2013
#56
Well, if hypocrisy is a disqualifier, I have a pretty big list you can include
askeptic
Jun 2013
#57
Yep. Maybe he was covering for what he was really up to? Who knows? Keep your eye on the ball,
silvershadow
Jun 2013
#87