Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: EPA Raises Levels of Glyphosate Residue Allowed in Food [View all]BronxBoy
(2,287 posts)go astray. Shallo and misplaced analysis does no one any good.
The issue right now is not what the effects of Roundup is on human health. I think that is a longer term issue that is worthy of discussion. I think the immediate concern is why the acceptable levels had to be raised at this point in time. If Roundup is doing its job as its supposed to do, why the need for a dramatic increase in allowable usage?
Well I'm just a farmer and not a scientist but I think the answer has to do in large part with the increasing prevalence of Roundup resistant weeds. Here in Georgia, Glyphosate resistant weeds, especially pigweed. is becoming an ever increasing problem. Could this be why the acceptable levels were increased? The weeds have more immunity so we need to dump more roundup on the weeds? And if that's the case, at some point wouldn't there be valid concerns about the effects on human health now or should we wait until peer reviewed studies are conducted down the road when acceptable application levels are 50 or 100 % of what the original standards were?
So while potential effects on human health is definitely an important issue in this discussion, I believe the immediate issue is why Roundup appears to be losing its arms race against the world of weeds.