Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Deep13

(39,157 posts)
30. Well, a child should not be considered a battle field.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 11:26 AM
Jul 2013

Death is inevitable and at some point the futile attempt to save her is just piling on cruelty. It has only been very recently that parents have had the luxury of assuming their children will survive them. It used to be pretty typical to lose half of ones children to disease before they grew up. I don't want to minimize the anguish of the parents, but they really need to accept their loss and move on.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I hope so much that they can stop the infection. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2013 #1
How can she survive so many surgeries? Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #21
She can still pull through. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #2
This whole story sorely pisses me off. Hulk Jul 2013 #3
Two sets...the first didn't work. dkf Jul 2013 #4
That's what I intended to say. Hulk Jul 2013 #5
Thank you for pointing this out. It's important. COLGATE4 Jul 2013 #27
Thank you for making an important point.... Rowdyboy Jul 2013 #37
Actually, from what I understand laundry_queen Jul 2013 #39
Haven't read that info anywhere. Hulk Jul 2013 #41
Maybe you need to read more laundry_queen Jul 2013 #42
Wow... RudynJack Jul 2013 #15
The first one didn't take. dkf Jul 2013 #16
Right...it didn't take "to a adolescent girl". Hulk Jul 2013 #17
weren't those rules in place before Obama became President ? JI7 Jul 2013 #8
I hate to say this, but it is likely that this child will die anyway. After all the organs Squinch Jul 2013 #29
The rules had nothing to do with the Obama administration Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #20
well there is NO reasoning with those right wing rat bastards alp227 Jul 2013 #22
Ugh! Honestly, though, lung transplants are always a long shot. nt Deep13 Jul 2013 #6
I didn't realize that. How bad? dkf Jul 2013 #7
50% of all lung transplants are dead within the first five years after the surgery. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2013 #9
Not good. Thanks. dkf Jul 2013 #10
Which is why at 61 years of age I won't be getting one. Doesn't make sense to transplant lungs to Monk06 Jul 2013 #18
I'm so sorry to hear that Monk. The best of luck to you. Auntie Bush Jul 2013 #33
I don't mind my life has been hard but I just can't stand to see children suffer or young people cut Monk06 Jul 2013 #34
That, believe it or not, represents quite an improvement. nt Deep13 Jul 2013 #23
I'm sure it does. CaliforniaPeggy Jul 2013 #24
A friend's sister had a lung transplant. leftyladyfrommo Jul 2013 #28
Ok, so when is enough, enough? Lunabelle Jul 2013 #11
All those surgeries! That poor child. Demit Jul 2013 #12
As many as it takes ... Igel Jul 2013 #13
I can't even imagine what they must be feeling. Demit Jul 2013 #14
Well, a child should not be considered a battle field. Deep13 Jul 2013 #30
The parents may well be preparing themselves for her eventual passing Sheldon Cooper Jul 2013 #35
Yeah, hard to guess when we are not faced with that situation. nt Deep13 Jul 2013 #36
I agree. laundry_queen Jul 2013 #40
This is just horrible Sgent Jul 2013 #19
Artificial lungs? telclaven Jul 2013 #25
I think its called the Novo Lung NNguyenMD Jul 2013 #38
The MSM covered up that her 1st transplant totally failed, and she was given 2 more lungs. graham4anything Jul 2013 #26
because the MSM was part of those that was making Sebelius and Obama out to be the bad guy JI7 Jul 2013 #31
The second set of lungs were adult lungs infected with pneumonia DeschutesRiver Jul 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Pa. Girl Who Got New Lung...»Reply #30