Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

limpyhobbler

(8,244 posts)
18. I didn't think so. The NSA publicly denied the existence of mass surveillance until Snowden.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 06:27 PM
Jul 2013

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is the fundamental problem, the process is NOT adversarial. nt bemildred Jul 2013 #1
The problem isn't that it's not adversarial... RiverNoord Jul 2013 #2
No, the problem isnt the secrecy either but rather with the lack of oversight. cstanleytech Jul 2013 #3
Agreed. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #10
OK... you're not describing real oversight RiverNoord Jul 2013 #19
The Chief Justice of the SCOTUS is a special position. Igel Jul 2013 #21
I think dividing up the appointment of the FISA judges would be a good idea davidpdx Jul 2013 #26
It does not seem to me that we disagree. bemildred Jul 2013 #5
If the government or a private non-profit appoints someone to represent the adversaries JDPriestly Jul 2013 #7
Serious Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #13
Right - I mean, you couldn't put the party RiverNoord Jul 2013 #14
The EFF or ACLU RiverNoord Jul 2013 #17
"What Fisa does is not adjudication, but approval." Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #4
Again, thanks Ed Snowden for leaking, thereby opening the door for legal challenges and criticism.nt limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #6
This was open knowledge before Snowden dished out the goods RiverNoord Jul 2013 #16
I didn't think so. The NSA publicly denied the existence of mass surveillance until Snowden. limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #18
Of course the NSA publicly denied RiverNoord Jul 2013 #20
"Court"? ForgoTheConsequence Jul 2013 #8
Again, there never are adversarial hearings RiverNoord Jul 2013 #15
There is never anyone there "to argue the other side" over the issuance of a warrant . . . markpkessinger Jul 2013 #22
Congress has no oversight why? BornLooser Jul 2013 #9
Because Congress isn't the Judiciary. Igel Jul 2013 #23
Rememb..YGBFKM! In the Berman the Boomer voice: "C'mon, Man!" BornLooser Jul 2013 #24
Isn't that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #11
Any objections? randome Jul 2013 #12
He's embarrassed, an outsider, and doesn't agree. Igel Jul 2013 #25
Yeah, why don't they fix this while they're at it..... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US must fix secret Fisa c...»Reply #18