Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
25. And that is why it fails as an ad, such people will NOT watch it.
Tue Jul 9, 2013, 07:16 PM
Jul 2013

It is to negative to keep people's attention. It is NOT, don't smoke, get laid (a positive message and if you look at most ads on TV most ads are a variation of that theme). It is to much "you smoke, you die" where is the POSITIVE message in that? People want to hear POSITIVE messages. The old TV Cigarette ads had that Positive Message, Basically "Be a real Man, Smoke Marlboro" "Be a real man, walk that mile for a Camel" etc. Being male I ignored the Ads to Females, but most of them were "Be sexy, be attractive, smoke Tiparillos". Notice those ads provide a POSITIVE Message, not a negative message. People avoid negative messages and advertisers know this.


Remember this ads are the product of a Judicial decision based on an agreement between the the Cigarettes makers and the States that sued them for the cost of treating people from the affects of tobacco. Part of that Agreement was the Cigarette makers were to pay for anti-Smoking ads. Big Tobacco did not want an independent group do it (they feared a rehash of the Kick the Habit Campaign), instead you see these High Price, High Expenditure advertisements designed to turn people off WATCHING THE AD. Thus the money is spent. Technically it is an Anti-Smoking ad. That the Ad it is a complete failure in stopping smoking for it was designed to turn people off from watching it is not even mentioned.

This ad campaign disgust me, this money could be spent on ads that WOULD BE EFFECTIVE. One way would be to re-run the Kick the Habit Ads, they were extremely effective, both at getting people to stop smoking and reducing the numbers of non-smokers (and as I said above the reason the Tobacco Companies agreed to ban cigarette ads on TV was to get those Kick the Habit Ads off TV). They were entertaining, did not turn off the intended audience and thus the intended audience heard the message. You are NOT just preaching to the Choir, but to everyone and that is why Big Tobacco want to make these types of ADs NOT Kick the Habit Positive ads and why I hate these type of Ads, they are a waste of Money.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Awesome! Smoking is Cool! onehandle Jul 2013 #1
Who wrote this ad, the Tobacco Companies? happyslug Jul 2013 #3
I disagree, I think this ad is effective but your idea is good too wordpix Jul 2013 #6
You are falling into the trap, Stalin and his Properganda agency fell into happyslug Jul 2013 #9
I am entitled to my opinion about this and any other ad and you're entitled to yours wordpix Jul 2013 #11
you were more patient than I would have been tomm2thumbs Jul 2013 #15
yes you are but the gross ads just make smokers feel mad and smoke more olddots Jul 2013 #38
Great! So you agree that the ad would reinforce the stopping decision for people who quit Cronus Protagonist Jul 2013 #21
Yes, Preaching to the Choir, keeps the Choir in the Church happyslug Jul 2013 #24
I rarely discuss the ins and outs of law as I'm not a lawye LanternWaste Jul 2013 #28
I had to read your comment several times, to many negatives. happyslug Jul 2013 #34
The ad is intended to scare people who don't smoke. JDPriestly Jul 2013 #18
And that is why it fails as an ad, such people will NOT watch it. happyslug Jul 2013 #25
I smoked for thirty nine years Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #36
This ad is so over the top it's actually funny ! virgogal Jul 2013 #26
I don't smoke, barely drink, don't eat animal products, consume minimal fat, and keep my kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #2
I agree with you. I buy indiv. health insurance & don't incur bills even close to my deductible wordpix Jul 2013 #5
Gee, I thought you did that stuff so you'd stay healthy longer Warpy Jul 2013 #7
Thank you me b zola Jul 2013 #8
I am becoming more of a believer over time in penalties for willful acts kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #10
How about driving SUVs? They pollute the air we all breathe, causing HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #19
Oh, don't even get me started on the urban assault vehicles....... kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #32
everyone should have affordable health care but it's barely affordable to me as a non-smoker wordpix Jul 2013 #12
No, not everyone is capable of that. Warpy Jul 2013 #14
Addiction. Is addiction a choice or an addiction? Walk a mile in an addicts shoes. Ed Suspicious Jul 2013 #29
I tried heroin in the 60s. Warpy Jul 2013 #37
+Infinity! You have nailed the essence of liberalism - nt HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #20
They learn one day CountAllVotes Jul 2013 #30
Yeah as a diabetic, I work to keep my diabetes going because I'm incentivised by all the Ed Suspicious Jul 2013 #27
Actually, I'm way left of most Dems these days. But I do resent having to pay kestrel91316 Jul 2013 #33
Anyone can get a break from smoking penalties... Deep13 Jul 2013 #4
bingo tomm2thumbs Jul 2013 #16
Everyone that smokes tobacco and cannot quit should switch to a vaporizer (e-cig) brett_jv Jul 2013 #13
This is ridiculous. Obamacare is becoming a joke because the administration JDPriestly Jul 2013 #17
It's starting to look less like a law and more like a set of options for the government to implement Igel Jul 2013 #22
details on Obamacare looked very different before the elections Blue Bike Jul 2013 #23
If they don't know CountAllVotes Jul 2013 #31
"Somker's penalty" or any penalty is a bad idea anyway. PSPS Jul 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Smokers may get temporary...»Reply #25