Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
39. This is quite likely
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 07:53 AM
Jul 2013

However, self defense law in most states really only begins to care what you did when the first blow is thrown, so to speak.

You can follow somebody, you can talk to them, even rudely, you can call them names, you can be a racist- none of that matters in self defense.

It only matters when the first blow is thrown and what happens after that.

The problem is that there simply isn't enough evidence from the time period that matters, the struggle.

If the jury is even 80% sure that Zimmerman is guilty, 20% is reasonable doubt, and they must acquit.

As a self defense instructor this case has me very conflicted. I have no doubt he profiled, and his judgement in pursuing Trayvon outside his car was very poor. But with go good witness of how things went down, we just don't know with certainty.

So on on hand, I want him in jail for life. I know he belongs there. But I also want it done by the same standard of justice that we have always had in this country that presumes innocence unless proves beyond a reasonable doubt. And I just don't think that the state had reached that burden- and I am really questioning why they are not trying harder.

I have always said that I would rather see 100 guilty people go free than 1 innocent person convicted, and even through my time working in LE I kept that opinion that our justice system should be set up with that sort of twist to protecting rights. When I was a deputy it just knew I had to work harder to have all my facts in line to convict. But this case really has me questioning if that is how we should be administering justice in this country, in a way where just by raising the possibility it could be other than what the state claims is enough to get away with it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

And then onto his and his wife's trial for illegal money transfers... LanternWaste Jul 2013 #1
and, hopefully, then a wrongful death suit against Zimmerman... B Stieg Jul 2013 #6
If he's acquitted customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #10
OJ got John2 Jul 2013 #15
Florida has immunity from civil and criminal prosecution for self defense. Kennah Jul 2013 #31
Read 776.041 John2 Jul 2013 #40
We agree that Zimmerman is guilty ... Kennah Jul 2013 #48
What I am wondering is obama2terms Jul 2013 #23
Yes, they can find GZ guilty of a lesser included offense. Kennah Jul 2013 #29
Though he shouldn't be Morganfleeman Jul 2013 #49
This is interesting reading Kennah Jul 2013 #56
I think that's what might happen obama2terms Jul 2013 #55
Zimmerman stalked TM with gun in hand, and killed him. Yah, "wrongful" ... delrem Jul 2013 #32
Who could defend a racist vigilante gun nut? nt onehandle Jul 2013 #2
who could defend an accused child rapist? Or the mastermind of 9-11? bossy22 Jul 2013 #13
Yet even those people, when discharged from their duties, have consciousness. delrem Jul 2013 #33
Gun nuts and racists Nevernose Jul 2013 #25
I used to ask my Law Professor that ... Myrina Jul 2013 #50
Sadly, I foresee 'an O.J.' coming. n/t ColesCountyDem Jul 2013 #3
I think he is going to be acquitted bossy22 Jul 2013 #14
I don't agree John2 Jul 2013 #17
Agreed Stuckinthebush Jul 2013 #22
The sickening feeling that GZ gets acquitted is growing inside of my stomach. Kennah Jul 2013 #30
I don't even think the defense thinks that will happen. reusrename Jul 2013 #37
The jury may acquit, sure, but if they do it won't be based on the evidence. reusrename Jul 2013 #36
This is quite likely Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #39
Can you give John2 Jul 2013 #42
You are kind of asking me to prove a negative Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #43
There is no John2 Jul 2013 #44
Sorry Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #45
In Illinois, you have a 'duty to retreat'. ColesCountyDem Jul 2013 #52
As a former deputy Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #53
I'm not a 'duty to retreat' fan, either. ColesCountyDem Jul 2013 #54
I'm looking at it JustAnotherGen Jul 2013 #51
What are rebutal witnesses? darkangel218 Jul 2013 #4
Someone or something that provides an alternate theory or witness to or about events. jtuck004 Jul 2013 #5
I dont get it. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #16
Yeah, some. The doc that works for the prosecution has an opinion, jtuck004 Jul 2013 #34
I smell a book deal..... Grassy Knoll Jul 2013 #7
I hope not obama2terms Jul 2013 #24
Defendent had a car and a gun. Dead victim had skittles. lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #8
I dont get it either darkangel218 Jul 2013 #18
the law and order types around here will tell you that following someone by car.. frylock Jul 2013 #19
If it is illegal, why wasn't Z charged with violating those laws? hack89 Jul 2013 #20
i never said it wasn't.. frylock Jul 2013 #21
This trial is a big Rorschach test hack89 Jul 2013 #41
you and me both frylock Jul 2013 #46
Of course those are all legal Nevernose Jul 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Jul 2013 #38
Seems quick, after all this time. /nt Ash_F Jul 2013 #9
did they bring up the THC? riverwalker Jul 2013 #11
The judge rules it admissible Nevernose Jul 2013 #27
could prosecution bring in as rebuttal riverwalker Jul 2013 #12
A more accurate rebuttal witness would be someone the same size as Trayvon Nevernose Jul 2013 #28
According to the newspaper report I read, he picked her up and threw her across the room. displacedtexan Jul 2013 #47
I Was Less Impressed By Today's "Expert" Witness DallasNE Jul 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»George Zimmerman trial: D...»Reply #39