Latest Breaking News

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)

45. Sorry

Wed Jul 10, 2013, 11:30 AM

Jul 2013

But you may feel that way, but as mad as it may make you it is simply not legal justification to use physical force against them.

Yes, if I choose to follow you and call you names and make threats against you, I can be charged with disorderly conduct.

But that DOES NOT give you cause to use physical force against me. One persons wrong is not justification for your own improper acts.

In NC it is an affirmative defense in front of a jury to claim that the person made threats of violence, so your resulting physical force was preemptive self defense, but even then you have to be able to articulate that you had cause to believe that it was more than just words and an assault on you was imminent. That is a high legal bar to reach, and it will have to be done in front of a jury and at considerable legal expense to you.

Trust me, if you hit somebody just for calling you a racial slur, even if they are following you around doing it, you will get convicted. At least in this state.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

56 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

George Zimmerman trial: Defense will likely rest case Wednesday [View all] Blue Bike Jul 2013 OP

And then onto his and his wife's trial for illegal money transfers... LanternWaste Jul 2013 #1

and, hopefully, then a wrongful death suit against Zimmerman... B Stieg Jul 2013 #6

If he's acquitted customerserviceguy Jul 2013 #10

OJ got John2 Jul 2013 #15

Florida has immunity from civil and criminal prosecution for self defense. Kennah Jul 2013 #31

Read 776.041 John2 Jul 2013 #40

We agree that Zimmerman is guilty ... Kennah Jul 2013 #48

What I am wondering is obama2terms Jul 2013 #23

Yes, they can find GZ guilty of a lesser included offense. Kennah Jul 2013 #29

Though he shouldn't be Morganfleeman Jul 2013 #49

This is interesting reading Kennah Jul 2013 #56

I think that's what might happen obama2terms Jul 2013 #55

Zimmerman stalked TM with gun in hand, and killed him. Yah, "wrongful" ... delrem Jul 2013 #32

Who could defend a racist vigilante gun nut? nt onehandle Jul 2013 #2

who could defend an accused child rapist? Or the mastermind of 9-11? bossy22 Jul 2013 #13

Yet even those people, when discharged from their duties, have consciousness. delrem Jul 2013 #33

Gun nuts and racists Nevernose Jul 2013 #25

I used to ask my Law Professor that ... Myrina Jul 2013 #50

Sadly, I foresee 'an O.J.' coming. n/t ColesCountyDem Jul 2013 #3

I think he is going to be acquitted bossy22 Jul 2013 #14

I don't agree John2 Jul 2013 #17

Agreed Stuckinthebush Jul 2013 #22

The sickening feeling that GZ gets acquitted is growing inside of my stomach. Kennah Jul 2013 #30

I don't even think the defense thinks that will happen. reusrename Jul 2013 #37

The jury may acquit, sure, but if they do it won't be based on the evidence. reusrename Jul 2013 #36

This is quite likely Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #39

Can you give John2 Jul 2013 #42

You are kind of asking me to prove a negative Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #43

There is no John2 Jul 2013 #44

Sorry Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #45

In Illinois, you have a 'duty to retreat'. ColesCountyDem Jul 2013 #52

As a former deputy Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #53

I'm not a 'duty to retreat' fan, either. ColesCountyDem Jul 2013 #54

I'm looking at it JustAnotherGen Jul 2013 #51

What are rebutal witnesses? darkangel218 Jul 2013 #4

Someone or something that provides an alternate theory or witness to or about events. jtuck004 Jul 2013 #5

I dont get it. darkangel218 Jul 2013 #16

Yeah, some. The doc that works for the prosecution has an opinion, jtuck004 Jul 2013 #34

I smell a book deal..... Grassy Knoll Jul 2013 #7

I hope not obama2terms Jul 2013 #24

Defendent had a car and a gun. Dead victim had skittles. lindysalsagal Jul 2013 #8

I dont get it either darkangel218 Jul 2013 #18

the law and order types around here will tell you that following someone by car.. frylock Jul 2013 #19

If it is illegal, why wasn't Z charged with violating those laws? hack89 Jul 2013 #20

i never said it wasn't.. frylock Jul 2013 #21

This trial is a big Rorschach test hack89 Jul 2013 #41

you and me both frylock Jul 2013 #46

Of course those are all legal Nevernose Jul 2013 #26

This message was self-deleted by its author hack89 Jul 2013 #38

Seems quick, after all this time. /nt Ash_F Jul 2013 #9

did they bring up the THC? riverwalker Jul 2013 #11

The judge rules it admissible Nevernose Jul 2013 #27

could prosecution bring in as rebuttal riverwalker Jul 2013 #12

A more accurate rebuttal witness would be someone the same size as Trayvon Nevernose Jul 2013 #28

According to the newspaper report I read, he picked her up and threw her across the room. displacedtexan Jul 2013 #47

I Was Less Impressed By Today's "Expert" Witness DallasNE Jul 2013 #35