Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Igel

(37,614 posts)
2. Why?
Wed Jul 10, 2013, 12:02 PM
Jul 2013

This kind of thing is exactly what the National Salvation Front referred to as full cooperation and evidence they wanted Morsi to succeed. Bail from elections, don't run candidates, don't attend meetings when invited, turn down positions in the government, support anything that stymies Morsi.

And call it, to thunderous applause, "full cooperation."

This continues the same kind of attitude. There was a chance that first year to dial back on the polarization. But what good things Morsi did were treated as cynical ploys and rejected with strong condemnation, and his mistakes magnified and taken to be permanent even if he reversed them. After that the polarization was monotonically increasing. The opposition could do no wrong. Morsi could do no right.

This rupture in civil society has been carefully nursed and nurtured when it served one side. Now it's going to be inconvenient and the other side will be blamed for allowing it to happen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Egypt's Muslim Brotherhoo...»Reply #2