Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: D.C. Council approves ‘living wage’ bill over Wal-Mart ultimatum [View all]lawwolf
(58 posts)53. I don't understand the excitement over this vote.
If a living wage is important, why not require all employers to pay it. Why is it bad for Wal-Mart to pay $8.25 to it's employees but it is ok for CVS (or any other smaller, low to no skill employer) to pay $8.25. Also, as pointed out, all Wal-Mart has to do is build a store that is 74,000 square feet and they can continue to pay $8.25. This just seems to me to be yet another pointless political statement that will have very little real life impact.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Ha, good one! Nice to know Wall Street/Big Business doesn't always win. nt
the Weird Liberal
Jul 2013
#19
Thought it was interesting here a few years ago Walmart was happy to tell their employees to go
Thinkingabout
Jul 2013
#21