Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Dominicans Rage Against Obama's Gay Ambassador Pick [View all]DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)28. The U.S. could invade...
...we've done it before.
United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (191624)
Most Dominicans, however, greatly resented the loss of their sovereignty to foreigners, few of whom spoke Spanish or displayed much real concern for the welfare of the republic. A guerrilla movement, known as the gavilleros, leaders such as General Ramon Natera, enjoyed considerable support from the population in the eastern provinces of El Seibo and San Pedro de Macorís. Having knowledge of the local terrain, they fought against the United States occupation from 1917 to 1921. American naval forces maintained order during a period of chronic and threatened insurrection.[RL30172] In 1921, the gavilleros were crushed due to scorched earth tactics, superior air power, firepower and counterinsurgency methods of the United States military.
United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (196566)
After a period of political instability following the assassination of long-time Dominican dictator Rafael Trujillo in 1961, candidate Juan Bosch, a founder of the anti-Trujilloist Dominican Revolutionary Party (PRD), was elected President in December, 1962 and inaugurated in February 1963.
The hierarchy of the Catholic Church also resented the secular nature of the new constitution, in particular its provision for legalized divorce. The hierarchy, along with the military leadership and the economic elite, also feared communist influence in the republic, and they warned of the potential for "another Cuba". The result of this concern and opposition was a military coup d'état on September 25, 1963.
The coup effectively negated the 1962 elections by installing a civilian junta, known as the "Triunvirato", dominated by the Trujullistas remnants. The initial head of the Triumvirate was Donald Reid Cabral. The Triumvirate never succeeded in establishing its authority over competing conservative factions both inside and outside the military; it also never convinced the majority of the population of its legitimacy. The widespread dissatisfaction with Reid and his government, coupled with lingering loyalties to Bosch, produced a revolution on May 16.
<snip -more political turmoil and armed clashes>
U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson, convinced of the defeat of the Loyalist forces and fearing the creation of "a second Cuba"[4] on America's doorstep, ordered U.S. forces to restore order. The decision to intervene militarily in the Dominican Republic was Lyndon Johnson's personal decision. All civilian advisers had recommended against immediate intervention hoping that the Loyalist side could bring an end to the civil war.
The hierarchy of the Catholic Church also resented the secular nature of the new constitution, in particular its provision for legalized divorce. The hierarchy, along with the military leadership and the economic elite, also feared communist influence in the republic, and they warned of the potential for "another Cuba". The result of this concern and opposition was a military coup d'état on September 25, 1963.
The coup effectively negated the 1962 elections by installing a civilian junta, known as the "Triunvirato", dominated by the Trujullistas remnants. The initial head of the Triumvirate was Donald Reid Cabral. The Triumvirate never succeeded in establishing its authority over competing conservative factions both inside and outside the military; it also never convinced the majority of the population of its legitimacy. The widespread dissatisfaction with Reid and his government, coupled with lingering loyalties to Bosch, produced a revolution on May 16.
<snip -more political turmoil and armed clashes>
U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson, convinced of the defeat of the Loyalist forces and fearing the creation of "a second Cuba"[4] on America's doorstep, ordered U.S. forces to restore order. The decision to intervene militarily in the Dominican Republic was Lyndon Johnson's personal decision. All civilian advisers had recommended against immediate intervention hoping that the Loyalist side could bring an end to the civil war.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
so they are not even true to their own religion, no surprise there, since according to their cult
msongs
Jul 2013
#1
The substantial Dominican-American community may have something to say about this
KamaAina
Jul 2013
#9
There are some really awful homophobes in the NYC Dominican community, though
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
#16
Recall the ambassador and cut foreign aid. They can't dictate their religious intolerance.
Zen Democrat
Jul 2013
#10
Is this the official stance of the Dominican government or just a noisy nut case religious group?
azurnoir
Jul 2013
#12
This from a country that auctions off young girls and boys to pedophiliac sex tourists.
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
#13
Limbaugh is the world's most loathsome sex tourist. Quite a feat, given the other
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
#22
Sadly LGBT rights have a very long way to go in many parts of the world. n/t
totodeinhere
Jul 2013
#14
But..but..but...sometimes homophobia is just something we should tolerate.
Behind the Aegis
Jul 2013
#17
Imagine a country trying to send an Ambassador to the US and that individual was steadfast that
24601
Jul 2013
#24
WTF? Opposition to misogyny and racism is the same as homophobia? Seriously, WTF?
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#27
Never said or implied they were. I was saying only that what receiving nations believe needs to be
24601
Jul 2013
#29
You must work for the CIA or NSA, because your dot-connecting ability has jumped from what was
24601
Jul 2013
#36
The facts are provided by your post: the false equivalency where intolerance of bigotry is no
idwiyo
Jul 2013
#43
We wouldn't send a Jew to SA because s/he wouldn't be allowed in the country.
Behind the Aegis
Jul 2013
#33
You are not accurate in the belief that Jews are not allowed in Saudi Arabia. While any non-Islamic
24601
Jul 2013
#39
I'm a little surprised that one stood. Guess some are easily fooled by a "reasonable" tone.
nomorenomore08
Jul 2013
#35
I'd actually imagine quite a few ambassadors to the United States hold odious views
Posteritatis
Jul 2013
#32
Bigotry should never be accommodated. If the pseudo-christian haters in the Dominican Republic
Zorra
Jul 2013
#49
I know you don't think you're comparing apples and oranges, but you are. If they objected...
Moonwalk
Jul 2013
#52
Deal with it, Dominicans! We'll pick whomever we damn well please as our ambassador.
Pterodactyl
Jul 2013
#37
You do realize that nations are not obligated to accept the credentials of another don't you? And
24601
Jul 2013
#42
Sure, if they want to spit in our eye out of homophobia, their price to pay. nt
geek tragedy
Jul 2013
#45
What price are you suggesting? Would the President need another Authorized Use of Military
24601
Jul 2013
#51
You weren't specific and I couldn't tell what you were suggesting. Didn't know if you meant this is
24601
Jul 2013
#56