Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
41. Not really
Thu Jul 11, 2013, 10:45 PM
Jul 2013

It was weak. Very poorly constructed and presented.

He never laid out a clear chain of events that will remain 100% believable after the defense gets their say. He should have been laying out a clear narrative of facts that tell the story so they can reach a verdict, one that will survive all the defense will throw at it tomorrow. But instead he spent much, too much, of the time appealing to emotion.

He spent most of the time just poking holes in Zimmermans story. That is what a defense attorney is supposed to do. He never laid out a clear, concise chain of events that was believable beyond a reasonable doubt. He didn't. He asked a whole lot of questions. You don't eliminate reasonable doubt with questions, you create it.

Whoever did that powerpoint needs to be fired. It didn't just look amateurish, it contained things that made me go WTF? Like claims Zimmerman had an "overloaded gun"- what does that even mean? I am a certified firearms instructor and have never, ever heard such a term used. How does a professional prosecutor and his team let something like that get into its presentation?

At one point I heard him say "I hope this makes sense" about his own exhibit. Hey, McFly, your job is to eliminate doubt, not create it by using exhibits you are unsure the jury understands.

And lastly, he kept yelling. I know it was to appeal to emotion, but I expect it turned off the jurors. People yell when they are not confident of their argument.

Remember, the defense has a lot lower bar to reach than the prosecution. Imagine as an 90/10 thing. The Prosecution needs to create 90% or better certainty in the jurors minds that what they are saying happened like they are claiming to convict. The defense only needs to create more than 10% doubt or so that the prosecution is right to win.

Had this been a defense closing, poking holes in a story and asking questions to make jurors wonder and create doubt, I would say they did a good job. As a prosecution closing, it was lacking.

I am very disappointed.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yeah...never mind the shot, dead teen and the guy with the hot gun muttering "fucking punks." MADem Jul 2013 #1
That this wasn't a homicide investigation from git go Californeeway Jul 2013 #2
Welcome to DU, Californeeway! calimary Jul 2013 #4
You'll be Happy to Know lib87 Jul 2013 #5
Ex-Sanford police chief Hassin Bin Sober Jul 2013 #14
why has this racist piece of shit come out at this time ? JI7 Jul 2013 #3
Can you provoke a fight and then shoot and kill the person you provoked? Loudly Jul 2013 #6
I hate to say yes Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #9
Which really doesn't matter if true or not, because Zimmerman didn't attempt to back away Thor_MN Jul 2013 #11
I agree he is at fault Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #12
We can not even know if there was a "first blow" Thor_MN Jul 2013 #13
I know Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #16
Seriously? You believe an unproven punch can be justification for shooting someone? Thor_MN Jul 2013 #23
What is can be Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #25
it looks like you posted this before Bernie's closing today.. I'm curious Voice for Peace Jul 2013 #40
Not really Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #41
To follow up a little Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #44
You know what, John2 Jul 2013 #15
That isn't how the law works Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #17
That is not how the law work in John2 Jul 2013 #22
But Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #24
If I was a kid John2 Jul 2013 #27
Giving you concern Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #29
It is very strange, John2 Jul 2013 #30
Actually I am not taking that view Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #32
OK, I see John2 Jul 2013 #33
I disgree Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #34
Stalking likely has a specific meaning and following someone whole reporting their movements to the 24601 Jul 2013 #37
I tend to agree Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #38
If they couldn't come up with probable cause after 40 days davidpdx Jul 2013 #7
It seemed to John2 Jul 2013 #19
Did CNN interview the City Manager to see if he agreed with Lee's description? Jim__ Jul 2013 #8
city manager and city officials are tight lipped the lawsuits coming upon acquittal will be large ceonupe Jul 2013 #26
This is total bull. John2 Jul 2013 #28
because in FL if you are acquitted of Murder you cant be sued in civil court ceonupe Jul 2013 #31
That's interesting rpannier Jul 2013 #10
Did the investigator not recommend to the DA to press charges that night? Ash_F Jul 2013 #18
That is why this John2 Jul 2013 #21
I'm fairly certain this would have been handled differently Mz Pip Jul 2013 #20
Good. reflection Jul 2013 #35
Florida is run by Republicans LiberalLovinLug Jul 2013 #36
I hate to ever think there is that much corruption in the system Lee-Lee Jul 2013 #39
There's a very good reason you were elbowed out of the way, shit bag Pretzel_Warrior Jul 2013 #42
They botched the case DonCoquixote Jul 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ex-Sanford police chief: ...»Reply #41