Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Senator Ron Wyden: White House considering scaling back data collection [View all]Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)39. Oh, that's sad.
But, if you don't call your congressman right now, how will he ever know how you feels about it??
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senator Ron Wyden: White House considering scaling back data collection [View all]
think
Jul 2013
OP
I hope so. This could be dangerous if we had an administration that was inclined to abuse the
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#2
Yes - Astute Conjecture - Nothing Like Turning Out The Lights To Reduce Suspicions
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#44
To Make The Reply Stand Out - These Titles Are Like The Start To Articles - Hence The Capitalization
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#72
Whereas I think that Predator Drones should blow up the data storage and collection centers
Demeter
Jul 2013
#68
He's my Senator and he's a good one too just like Senator Merkley. Blathering?
neverforget
Jul 2013
#41
Why would the WH weaken national security by scaling back on data collection unless
indepat
Jul 2013
#18
Because the constant obstruction around it would do even worse damage to national security?
ConservativeDemocrat
Jul 2013
#61
No thanks. I am not cheering a Constitutional violation simply because it MAY involve fewer victims
merrily
Jul 2013
#48
This falls way short. I want to know what Booz-Allen and the Crlyle Group's roll is in the
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#21
If this is true then it turns out that Snowden did perform a vital public service.
totodeinhere
Jul 2013
#24
We don't know squat. We only have someone's word for it. But, right, it is not about Obama.
merrily
Jul 2013
#50
their diffidence of late in public statements have made me think something is up
carolinayellowdog
Jul 2013
#27
"THE ADMINISTRATION HAS GIVEN WYDEN NO ADDITIONAL ASSURANCES OF CHANGES"! n/t
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#30
No Congressman is in charge of the let's-spy-upon-all-Americans policy.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#38
Bad headline. The story really says that Wyden "wants to believe" it. He also "has a feeling."
PSPS
Jul 2013
#35
Scaling back from "way too fucking much" to "too fucking much" would be my guess. n/t
winter is coming
Jul 2013
#57
Bullshit. You don't "scale back" on violations of the Fourth Amendment.
woo me with science
Jul 2013
#65