Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
9. yes.. I think for the most part the practice is sound and legit.
Sat Jul 13, 2013, 06:53 AM
Jul 2013

It just needs some tightening up to ensure there is no abuse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I need more specifics before I can comment pro or con. merrily Jul 2013 #1
There are at least two specifics mentioned.. DCBob Jul 2013 #3
Not really specific at all. When dealing with lawyers, exact wording is everything. merrily Jul 2013 #6
Sounds reasonable. DCBob Jul 2013 #2
Some loose ends. What a way to put it. merrily Jul 2013 #8
yes.. I think for the most part the practice is sound and legit. DCBob Jul 2013 #9
Disagree. The basic and pervasive attitude is a huge problem. merrily Jul 2013 #10
I think their "basic and pervasive attitude" is simply to protect the general public.. DCBob Jul 2013 #12
Protect the general public from what? merrily Jul 2013 #15
Wow.. there is so much exaggeration in that post.. DCBob Jul 2013 #17
Your reply 17 is untrue. I can back up everything in my post with links to merrily Jul 2013 #18
You're doing Cha Jul 2013 #20
Thanks Cha.. DCBob Jul 2013 #21
The First Amendment is first for a damn good reason. ... spin Jul 2013 #4
I think so too. So did Manning, Snowden and wikileaks. merrily Jul 2013 #16
telling that this is even an issue. KG Jul 2013 #5
Yep. And I don't know if even a partial remedy would have come so quickly if the press had merrily Jul 2013 #7
Since the NSA is getting all the data anyway fasttense Jul 2013 #11
Just window dressing Android3.14 Jul 2013 #13
Oh it's ok. christx30 Jul 2013 #25
Maybe you could tighten the rules on taxpayer money seized to give out for corporate subsidies. jtuck004 Jul 2013 #14
The new rules appear to be the same as the old rules Yo_Mama Jul 2013 #19
like 99 lashes instead of 100, the tradeoff being extra salt thrown to finish it off. delrem Jul 2013 #22
Sounds like a payoff to the corporate media. blackspade Jul 2013 #23
He is completely untrustworthy. Safetykitten Jul 2013 #24
Holder seems to do whatever he wants. Ash_F Jul 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Atty. Gen. Eric Holder to...»Reply #9