Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Senator Ron Wyden: White House considering scaling back data collection [View all]winter is coming
(11,785 posts)57. Scaling back from "way too fucking much" to "too fucking much" would be my guess. n/t
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Senator Ron Wyden: White House considering scaling back data collection [View all]
think
Jul 2013
OP
I hope so. This could be dangerous if we had an administration that was inclined to abuse the
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#2
Yes - Astute Conjecture - Nothing Like Turning Out The Lights To Reduce Suspicions
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#44
To Make The Reply Stand Out - These Titles Are Like The Start To Articles - Hence The Capitalization
cantbeserious
Jul 2013
#72
Whereas I think that Predator Drones should blow up the data storage and collection centers
Demeter
Jul 2013
#68
He's my Senator and he's a good one too just like Senator Merkley. Blathering?
neverforget
Jul 2013
#41
Why would the WH weaken national security by scaling back on data collection unless
indepat
Jul 2013
#18
Because the constant obstruction around it would do even worse damage to national security?
ConservativeDemocrat
Jul 2013
#61
No thanks. I am not cheering a Constitutional violation simply because it MAY involve fewer victims
merrily
Jul 2013
#48
This falls way short. I want to know what Booz-Allen and the Crlyle Group's roll is in the
rhett o rick
Jul 2013
#21
If this is true then it turns out that Snowden did perform a vital public service.
totodeinhere
Jul 2013
#24
We don't know squat. We only have someone's word for it. But, right, it is not about Obama.
merrily
Jul 2013
#50
their diffidence of late in public statements have made me think something is up
carolinayellowdog
Jul 2013
#27
"THE ADMINISTRATION HAS GIVEN WYDEN NO ADDITIONAL ASSURANCES OF CHANGES"! n/t
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#30
No Congressman is in charge of the let's-spy-upon-all-Americans policy.
AnotherMcIntosh
Jul 2013
#38
Bad headline. The story really says that Wyden "wants to believe" it. He also "has a feeling."
PSPS
Jul 2013
#35
Scaling back from "way too fucking much" to "too fucking much" would be my guess. n/t
winter is coming
Jul 2013
#57
Bullshit. You don't "scale back" on violations of the Fourth Amendment.
woo me with science
Jul 2013
#65