Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)

19. Who is "we"?

Reply to harrose (Reply #11)

Fri Jul 19, 2013, 03:35 AM

Jul 2013

My guess is that the majority of the Democrats now in Congress would vote against impeachment. Mere disagreement with a judge's rulings would generally not be considered a solid basis for removing him or her from office. (Then there's the additional problem that some of the Democrats probably agree with some of the decisions that DUers criticize.)

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

20 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Justice Alito's finances explain his recusals [View all] Judi Lynn Jul 2013 OP

so in theory questionseverything Jul 2013 #1

That extremely loud, deafening shrieking is just the money talking Blue Owl Jul 2013 #2

And what if in theory sorefeet Jul 2013 #3

He knew his wife would inherit those stocks eventually,but never recused himself until Divernan Jul 2013 #4

Not a fan of alito and wouldnt care if a bus ran him over tommorrow but that line of reasoning cstanleytech Jul 2013 #7

The probability that his wife would inherit her father's stocks is a near certainty. Divernan Jul 2013 #10

Not defending Alito, Ruby the Liberal Jul 2013 #14

She was not the sole heir pscot Jul 2013 #15

I Tell You One POS That Wouldn't Recuse Himselof BlueManFan Jul 2013 #5

Agreed, Thomas has shown himself unfit to be a SCOTUS with the stuff he has cstanleytech Jul 2013 #8

And I Don't Like him BlueManFan Jul 2013 #6

It seems his finances are hampering his ability to do his job Warpy Jul 2013 #9

We need to gain control of the House and 2/3 of the Senate... harrose Jul 2013 #11

Hear! Hear!! n/t ReRe Jul 2013 #12

Who is "we"? Jim Lane Jul 2013 #19

We need to recuse his A__ right off the Court. ReRe Jul 2013 #13

At least he has the decency to recuse himself . . . markpkessinger Jul 2013 #16

That�s rich (no pun intended) � 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2013 #17

That wouldn't have stopped Scalia rpannier Jul 2013 #18

He should buy more stock. The more often he has to recuse himself, the better. n/t hughee99 Jul 2013 #20