Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Cries of Betrayal as Detroit Plans to Cut Pensions [View all]happyslug
(14,779 posts)20. Actually, the US Supreme Court has ruled otherwised
Original Chapter IX was ruled to be unconstitutional for it interfered with HOW a state could set itself up. Later on a highly modified Chapter IX was approved by the US Supreme Court, once Congress made it clear that the State had to agree AND THAT SUCH AGREEMENT MUST COMPLY WITH STATE LAW.
Thus the Governor just can not agree to the Bankruptcy, State law must permit the State to agree. If State law does NOT permit it, then the filing is unconstitutional for it interferes with how a state forms itself and its municipalities.
This is the chief reason they have been only 500 municipal bankruptcies since Chapter IX (Now Chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code) passed in 1934.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Plus the very little they had to contribute to Political Parties is no longer available
Bandit
Jul 2013
#17
Show me how you plan to take a dollar, let alone trillions, from offshore
Dreamer Tatum
Jul 2013
#27
I think it's pretty clear that all that wasted revenue is not needed in Detroit.
Lasher
Jul 2013
#34