Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AngryAmish

(25,704 posts)
13. This is not my field, so if I'm wrong my guess are worth exactly what you paid for them..
Wed Jul 24, 2013, 10:26 AM
Jul 2013

I'd bet the case would proceed in BK. The umpire, er bankruptcy judge, would rule on most things except the state constitutional issue. For those he would certify a question along the lines of "Can we constitutionally reduce the pensions" send it to Michigan Supreme Court, have them answer it, then proceed pursuant to MI Supreme Court's answer.

Then the US Court of Appeals gets to deal with it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Michigan appeals court ha...»Reply #13