Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,218 posts)
5. Reading all the way down, it's not clear this was about the Lockerbie bomber
Sat Jul 27, 2013, 07:41 PM
Jul 2013

First, it notes that the Libyans never bought this air defence system. It is also about a prisoner transfer agreement that Blair's government agreed, but which excluded Megrahi. What the email said is:

“Col Q may very well raise Megrahi,” wrote Sir Vincent, “Saif (Gaddafi’s son) raised the case … last week. It is now before the Scottish Appeal Court and sub-judice.

“While the appeal is current, no request to invoke the PTA can be made in that case. Were the appeal to fail and a request for Megrahi’s return to Libya were to be made subsequently, it would be for Scottish ministers to decide on any such request — not a question for HMG (Her Majesty’s Government).”


I think the Telegraph is reading more into this than can honestly be done, especially with that headline.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Lockerbie bomber release ...»Reply #5