Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mwooldri

(10,817 posts)
14. "snowy" ???
Tue Jul 30, 2013, 10:21 AM
Jul 2013

In "Ye Olden Analogue Days", I'd say that I got about 3-4 channels here in the Greensboro, NC area that I would consider a "good" picture. The others were "watchable" but certainly had snow, ghosting and obvious other interference in the picture.

Digital has changed all of that. The picture you get is either there, or not. There is the "digital cliff" where the signal cannot be decoded properly by the receiver so the picture becomes blocky and the sound is choppy.

An outside antenna (if possible) really helps. So our current home set up can now receive all of our "in-market" channels, plus a few of the stations from outside the local area (Raleigh, NC and Roanoke, VA). With the exception of our NBC affiliate, all stations come in with a steady, unbroken picture 98% of the time. The NBC affiliate breaks up more often because of the way the antenna is mounted and it doesn't have a rotator as in days gone by.

I'm sure that given an outdoor antenna hooked up to a TV set capable of receiving digital broadcast signals, you could receive a good version of ABC, and quite likely many others. Even with an indoor antenna improvements are obvious - stations that were "there" but unwatchable are clean and clear in digital. Now I will state that people who had access to a certain channel in analog days lost it with the digital switchover

Try this link http://transition.fcc.gov/mb/engineering/dtvmaps/ - plug in your address, and see what the FCC thinks you should be able to receive. The stations in green are ones you should be able to get easily with an indoor antenna. The yellow ones should be easy with an outdoor antenna but a bit of a struggle with an indoor one. The orange ones do need an outdoor antenna and even then there is no guarantee of getting them.

If your address comes up with a lot of "green" stations, give it a go with an indoor antenna... even if it is a lot of "yellow" ones try it anyway, because it could work.

As for that ABC station being "snowy" there is an unlikely possibility that the station in question is being transmitted in analogue from a nearby translator. Low powered stations and translators can still broadcast in analogue in the interim - though why the switch wouldn't be made I don't know... a local low-powered TV station whose signal was barely watchable outside of Reidsville, NC... when they went digital they did manage to get a channel to broadcast on and gained a larger coverage area, even though there was no increase to the transmitters' power output.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If only there was a computer network one could use to bypass cable companies... n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #1
considering that cable is a monopoly in most places they got a lotta nerve lol nt msongs Jul 2013 #2
How bizarre. Hekate Jul 2013 #3
Don't satellite signals reach you? onenote Jul 2013 #6
I use satellite for my non local stations. OTA for local. LiberalFighter Jul 2013 #12
"snowy" ??? mwooldri Jul 2013 #14
Hmm. more likely because of the Santa Monica Mtns on that curve. alp227 Aug 2013 #36
On the Central Coast the ocean is actually to our south Hekate Aug 2013 #37
Letterman is going to have fun with this. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #4
He's the only thing good on CBS. nt valerief Jul 2013 #15
The clip is up.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #18
Says clip is not available or may have expired. nt valerief Jul 2013 #19
I just checked it again and it worked. Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #23
Here ya go.... Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #24
Ha! Thanks. Love Dave!!! nt valerief Jul 2013 #29
I prefer Craigy Ferg burnodo Jul 2013 #31
Ah, yes. Maybe you're right. nt valerief Jul 2013 #32
This article is misleading. christx30 Jul 2013 #5
correct. If CBS goes "dark" its because CBS is refusing to allow onenote Jul 2013 #7
...which in turn is because TWC isn't yet offering to pay what CBS wants. Orsino Jul 2013 #33
Yes, but the power to force a shutdown ultimately lies entirely with CBS onenote Jul 2013 #34
The power to give CBS what they want similarly lies with TWC. Orsino Aug 2013 #38
600% increase davidpdx Jul 2013 #8
The Cable/ISP I work for went thru this with AMC earlier this year sweetloukillbot Jul 2013 #17
Cable companies are greedy christx30 Jul 2013 #25
And all those channels that people say they don't want and don't want to pay for... sweetloukillbot Jul 2013 #27
These huge corporations should stop trying to enlist their customers 6000eliot Jul 2013 #9
I got an email today at work about this part: christx30 Jul 2013 #10
Next year we get google... Javaman Jul 2013 #11
If you're going for the "free" christx30 Jul 2013 #28
I'll take my chances. TW stinks. nt Javaman Jul 2013 #30
A pox on both their houses. marble falls Jul 2013 #13
I'm sure our regulators will insure subscribers get a generous refund Trillo Jul 2013 #16
Sure! elleng Jul 2013 #20
Agreed. I should have used the /sarcasm thingy. NT Trillo Jul 2013 #21
Gotcha. elleng Jul 2013 #22
My next "cable" will be Politicalboi Jul 2013 #26
cable cartels NuttyFluffers Aug 2013 #35
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Time Warner Temporarily R...»Reply #14