Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RBInMaine

(13,570 posts)
31. Nice post. Here are some other important thoughts to note though:
Sun Feb 19, 2012, 07:14 AM
Feb 2012

First, early polling like this doesn't mean much. Next, that said, I would bet this was at least a bit of an abberation which can occur in polling. For example, here in Maine in November some polls had it as a close race in our referendum election to kill the new Republican anti-voting law. In the end, we won by 20 points. Why so close in two of the polls? Because the polling models and procedures were flawed. They over-polled more Republican leaning voters and under-polled lower income folks, students, less likely voters, and single women, many of whom do not have landlines. They also did not do well accounting for our side's superior turnout operation. Even in scientific polling models, some of them can produce inaccurate results. I'm willing to hazard that the poll showing Brown up so far was somewhat off base for similar reasons. It is hard to imagine that there was such a swing toward Brown in so short a time even with him getting some good recent press.

Now, Warren is campaigning ALL OVER the state and is drawing good crowds. But yes, it is always hard to beat an incumbent, and a lot of people are not yet paying attention and Brown still has more name recognition. And yes, to win she needs to get more indies. And yes, Brown is personable and likeable. All true. But so is Warren, and she is actually doing pretty well as a new campaigner. She aint no Martha Coakley. To win, she will need to relentlessly press her economic issues, and she will need to be willing to go on OFFENSE BIGTIME and attack Brown on all his Republican anti-job votes and also including his most recent vote in favor of the Blunt attack on women's reproductive rights. She must run the video of Brown asking David Koch for money a thousand times. She must DAMAGE the guy bigtime by creating a narrative that he is of, by, and for the right wing rich and privileged and not just this
"average guy who drives a truck". He will have more money, but she will have a lot of money too. She will have a good team, and women voters will flock to her bigtime. She will have a strong base of support and volunteers.

I think once she wins her primary and we get more into the spring, things will come into better focus. The Dems did well in MA in 2010 because they learned from the loss of Teddy's seat to Brown. These are new times, and Dems will be even more energized in Mass.

So, it is still early. Taking out Brown won't be easy. But it is very, very doable in a state where registered Dems outnumber R's 4-1. But it will only happen with the RIGHT campaign.

Yes, right now they need to ATTACK Brown on his vote in favor of Blunt's crazy bill. Then need to push this issue RELENTLESSLY. It will not bode well at all with women in MA, even with many R women there. If Warren can overwhelmingly energize and win the MA women's vote, she will most likely win that race especially if that women's vote crosses party lines and brings in tons of indie women and some R women.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Can we dope slap everyone in Massachusetts? baldguy Feb 2012 #1
Chill down friend. This is ONE poll. Could be inaccurate. It's VERY early. SEE ME BELOW FOR MORE. RBInMaine Feb 2012 #32
Me thinks.............. Swede Atlanta Feb 2012 #2
Also Kelvin Mace Feb 2012 #4
When Mass voters wake up to Brown's Blount blunder peace frog Feb 2012 #9
I find this hard to believe Yo_Mama Feb 2012 #3
You're right, why limit it to Massachusetts? izquierdista Feb 2012 #5
"It's called the American Dream because you have to be asleep to believe it" TBF Feb 2012 #10
Brown... kenfrequed Feb 2012 #6
Name Recognition is the answer for the poll. kemah Feb 2012 #7
I welcome this poll. If we are lucky, it will be a wake up call from many dems Mass Feb 2012 #8
How does this work? Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #14
I should have said "both candidates's negative" . Mass Feb 2012 #16
That makes more sense, but Old and In the Way Feb 2012 #21
" " " " " "n/t MBS Feb 2012 #23
This Senate Seat Is Winnable For The Dems...... global1 Feb 2012 #11
Depends on where they poll. Cleita Feb 2012 #12
Not true karynnj Feb 2012 #25
You are entitled to your opinion, but Cleita Feb 2012 #26
I worked for about 20 years primarily doing sampling forAT&T/Bell Labs karynnj Feb 2012 #27
I thought so, that you were in that area of Cleita Feb 2012 #28
Nice post. Here are some other important thoughts to note though: RBInMaine Feb 2012 #31
PLUS this poll company is Iliyah Feb 2012 #13
Not for MA. They were spot on for the two 2010 races (Sen and Gov). Mass Feb 2012 #15
Stay at home Dems, stay at home in November jpak Feb 2012 #17
oh whatever SaintPete Feb 2012 #20
Last week she was 7 points ahead graywarrior Feb 2012 #18
When did Massachusetts get that dumb? jwirr Feb 2012 #19
I don't know,but if Scott Brown wins, they'd better change their name to Dumbassachusetts virtualobserver Feb 2012 #22
if Dems can't even pick up this seat, i'm pretty sure we're losing the senate 0rganism Feb 2012 #24
That's a big if... CBHagman Feb 2012 #29
For christ sake this on ONE poll in Feb. & could be flawed. Just chill out. It is very, very early. RBInMaine Feb 2012 #33
I can't wait to see the debates. Fearless Feb 2012 #30
I am not worried.....Warren will win ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2012 #34
If we can't win that one back, time to pull the plug Doctor_J Feb 2012 #35
That cannot be right. BigDemVoter Feb 2012 #36
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scott Brown Leads Elizabe...»Reply #31