Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zipplewrath

(16,698 posts)
29. Kinda hard to measure
Thu Aug 8, 2013, 11:41 AM
Aug 2013

That's always a tough one to argue. There's no real hard definition of what a democrat is.

He has worked with the democratic leadership (Pelosi and Ried). So for alot of people that's what it means to be a democrat. And as you say there has been his work, as soft and gentle as it was, on DADT and ultimately where he, and his administration, got to on DOMA. He's also been a defender of abortion rights and voting rights, albeit I'm sure there are those that would like more.

I know what you mean, it is often the case that he seems to take the most rightward position a democrat could possibly take. He has made the case (when arguing about GOP obstructionism) that about a decade ago he'd be considered a moderate republican. And, as you suggest, he even mentioned multiple times that his ACA wasn't all that different from what republicans proposed in opposition to HillaryCare.

I suspect his legacy in the long run will be a bit like Clinton's. Clinton is very popular today, but about the only thing he'd point to from his time in office is some foreign policy accomplishments, and a balanced budget, which didn't survive past his administration. In fact, much of what he accomplished is now gone. He isn't going to brag about eliminating Glass Steagal, and it's been replaced essentially by Dodd-Frank. DADT is gone. DOMA was declared basically unconstitutional. We can argue about how much of Welfare Reform is left, but I'd bet Clinton isn't bragging about much of it. NAFTA is still around, but again I don't think the Clintonites are going to be doing alot of bragging about that one either.

In the couple of years we had a democratic majority, he did sign things like Lilly Leadbetter, so in essence I think you have to acknowledge that he is "a democrat". But if you are looking for a more LBJ/FDR kinda democrat, you're going to be disappointed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Also discussion on this issue on DU in the thread here... PoliticAverse Aug 2013 #1
Now the rubber band is on the other claw! nt Xipe Totec Aug 2013 #2
Larry Summers, friend of the working man and woman. Octafish Aug 2013 #3
Wow! If that is true, we really do not want Larry Summers. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #17
Two-bit creep. Isn't there a petition on whitehouse.gov against him running the Fed? n/t Triana Aug 2013 #4
I believe I signed such a petition. Enthusiast Aug 2013 #42
im really not liking what ive heard about this guy Garion_55 Aug 2013 #5
Of course, the Republicans will encourage Obama to appoint Summers because that will JDPriestly Aug 2013 #15
Obama's good at doing that all by himself. Marr Aug 2013 #23
Sometimes I'm not sure that he is a Democrat at all. JDPriestly Aug 2013 #24
Kinda hard to measure zipplewrath Aug 2013 #29
Of course he did NV Whino Aug 2013 #6
How utterly disgusting. closeupready Aug 2013 #7
Move on, Mr. President ........... dothemath Aug 2013 #8
7 billion people, really. antigone382 Aug 2013 #35
Sounds like the same shit 'good ole boys' put Brooksley Born through, recall??? elleng Aug 2013 #9
My SO was at Harvard Helen Borg Aug 2013 #10
Myfriend and I were on the same flight to Madrid as he was a few years back... CTyankee Aug 2013 #33
So Obama is on HIS side...not Warren's. Says it all about Obama, doesn't it? forestpath Aug 2013 #11
Power has gotten to his head - he is forgetting that he works for the people who vote for him. NT. srican69 Aug 2013 #21
What got him in ceonupe Aug 2013 #27
He knows. Jakes Progress Aug 2013 #31
Lesson to the young: JDPriestly Aug 2013 #12
Like your sign - n/t laserhaas Aug 2013 #16
remember rtracey Aug 2013 #13
What makes you think they wouldn't? n/t durablend Aug 2013 #18
No Summer's - his reign must Fall laserhaas Aug 2013 #14
Obama sure does seem to be in a hurry to throw his Presidency away over the NSA and Summers. bemildred Aug 2013 #19
The President is surrounded by assholes like Summers. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #20
I think it's the other way around Tansy_Gold Aug 2013 #26
Yes, you're right. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #30
Except he's doing it to us instead of himself Tansy_Gold Aug 2013 #32
I'm not surprised that Dirty Larry the Misogynistic Deregulator was involved in that decision. nt adirondacker Aug 2013 #22
K&R midnight Aug 2013 #25
K&R MotherPetrie Aug 2013 #28
Summers is a dirtbag UpInArms Aug 2013 #34
of the wealthy, for the wealthy, by the wealthy.... mike_c Aug 2013 #36
Summers will have to go hat-in-hand to meet with Sen. Warren and beg her not to play SDjack Aug 2013 #37
Figures, the guy is a jerk. Beacool Aug 2013 #38
I'm shocked I tell you, shocked! Just say no to Sumners.... nt Blasphemer Aug 2013 #39
Just looking at his puss, you can tell he is a giant assclown. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #40
You bet. I see what you mean, after looking for photos. Unbelievable. Judi Lynn Aug 2013 #41
Fact check kick-I think Elizabeth Warren would be a fine POTUS n/t bobthedrummer Sep 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Larry Summers helped sink...»Reply #29