Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

ConcernedCanuk

(13,509 posts)

1. Must be some problems there - started construction in 2004

Reply to bananas (Original post)

Thu Aug 8, 2013, 08:28 PM

Aug 2013

.
.
.

estimated cost 35 billion, up to 65 billion and not completed yet.

However, I see no indication it is for nuclear weapons, although it may well be a byproduct to supply plutonium,

a result of the process of making hydro.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prototype_Fast_Breeder_Reactor

CC

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Engineer held with pictures of Kalpakkam reactor [View all] bananas Aug 2013 OP

Must be some problems there - started construction in 2004 ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #1

Yes, plutonium production for nuclear weapons. bananas Aug 2013 #3

A Pakistani agent no doubt n/t cosmicone Aug 2013 #2