Latest Breaking News

leveymg

(36,418 posts)

2. Why is this again framed as "fear" by KSA rather than an aggressive strategy of religious warfare?

Sun Aug 11, 2013, 04:22 PM

Aug 2013

It's curious that the terms Jihadi, Salaafist, and extremist are often applied to the Sunni militants the Saudis support, yet it is never seen in the corporate media to describe the character of the Royal Family, itself?

Why is that? Are they simply too rich to be described as dangerous, or are they actually so rich and dangerous that we dare not provoke them?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Saudi Arabia Steps Up Efforts to Oust Syria's Assad [View all] Comrade Grumpy Aug 2013 OP

Loving some of that Bush doctrine that has created great stability in the area. MyNameGoesHere Aug 2013 #1

Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Obama. MarkLaw Aug 2013 #16

Why is this again framed as "fear" by KSA rather than an aggressive strategy of religious warfare? leveymg Aug 2013 #2

KSA? JackRiddler Aug 2013 #4

KSA = Kingdom of Saudia Arabia (nt) Devil Child Aug 2013 #6

Does anyone care to make the case... JackRiddler Aug 2013 #3

You could ask the Shiites in Bahrain. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2013 #5

Indeed. Or the women, period. JackRiddler Aug 2013 #7

this isnt their first go round iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #8

I think John2 Aug 2013 #10

well of course iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #11

If you examine John2 Aug 2013 #13

This is an John2 Aug 2013 #9

alot of people dont know that about iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #12

What they claimed John2 Aug 2013 #15

Nothing about Qatar? jakeXT Aug 2013 #14

Going back in history.... Xolodno Aug 2013 #17

What if, . . . . . just what if, ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #18