Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TorchTheWitch

(11,065 posts)
58. it's indifference
Mon Feb 20, 2012, 09:18 AM
Feb 2012

Nothing at all to do with recognizing that women aren't weak little helpless creatures that need men to do their fighting for them.

IT. IS. INDIFFERENCE. It is indifference because birth control is not something high enough of their list of priorities to bother getting off the couch over for the simple biological fact that they themselves will never ever ever ever have to worry about getting pregnant. If it doesn't effect them personally then the male masses either simply can't be bothered or are already fighting on the wrong side.

And there is something somewhat logical about that. Which is why you aren't going to see straight people getting off the couch to protest marriage inequality and may even see some joining the fray on the wrong side. People only ever care enough about something when that something personally effects them. That's simply human nature.

Perhaps it makes you feel better to imagine that men remain silent on the issue of birth control because they were taught some time ago that women are strong enough to fight on their own without the help of men and are noblely allowing that to continue but it's wishful thinking. They simply do not care enough to be bothered or are embracing the wrong side.

The only reason we're even having to have women get into this fight is because of the indifference or outright objection to by men. If enough men were interested enough to join the fight or stop fighting on the wrong side there wouldn't BE any need for any fight.

You can never win ANYTHING without a loud majority and that is always going to mean men fighting along with us because without those men we will NEVER have a loud majority. Just as the GLBT community needs straights to loudly join them with their issue struggles, whites to loudly join racial minorities on theirs, etc.

I'm fucking PISSED that women are BACK having to fight this fight all over again because not enough women and men cared enough to fight to MAINTAIN what they already had just as I'm fucking PISSED that us worker drones are again having to fight for what we had already because too many worker drones couldn't be bothered enough to fight to MAINTAIN what they had finally won.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"..and deny women the ability to share their perspective.” duhneece Feb 2012 #1
not WTF. It's GOP. easy to confuse the two... n/t Gore1FL Feb 2012 #3
hah! that would get a heart eyewall Feb 2012 #12
Jump the shark? The GOP did that years ago. What now? Faygo Kid Feb 2012 #2
crucial Alternet article on what this jump back on birth control means yurbud Feb 2012 #54
And Republican women Senators didn't protest because??... truth2power Feb 2012 #4
Self loathing women? Some kind of Stockholm Syndrome?? left coaster Feb 2012 #6
because they, like most other republicans, prefer hating and losing to not hating and winning saras Feb 2012 #9
love the Political Positions Spectrum!! BlancheSplanchnik Feb 2012 #34
Love it! nt Mojorabbit Feb 2012 #39
Nice. CrispyQ Feb 2012 #42
Serena Joy Syndrome? lolly Feb 2012 #18
It's amazing what money will buy ... (n/t) Nihil Feb 2012 #47
why aren't Democratic MALE senators and others decrying this? spooky3 Feb 2012 #5
THANK YOU! EXACTLY. But, are you really that surprised? nt left coaster Feb 2012 #7
They're probably just standing back so as not to get blood spattered lunatica Feb 2012 #8
I want them to get angry, too! spooky3 Feb 2012 #11
So do I but their silence doesn't mean indifference lunatica Feb 2012 #25
The point is not that women are weak. spooky3 Feb 2012 #32
I think you understand my point lunatica Feb 2012 #36
it's indifference TorchTheWitch Feb 2012 #58
"No one with any brains wants to get in the way of angry women." CrispyQ Feb 2012 #45
Maybe you should take your tirade to the men lunatica Feb 2012 #50
I am taking it to the men. To democratic men. CrispyQ Feb 2012 #53
+ a gazillion!! nt chervilant Feb 2012 #16
Precisely! This is not just a "women's issue!" Chorophyll Feb 2012 #22
I'm sure they're supportive in the Halls of Congress and The Senate lunatica Feb 2012 #28
Really old feminists are Alcibiades Feb 2012 #29
Oh, you 'gals.' Don't drop your aspirin. onehandle Feb 2012 #10
yes, Andrea's face was priceless on hearing Sanitorium's handler wordpix Feb 2012 #15
is she ever not speechless? tooeyeten Feb 2012 #44
Where are the Democratic men..... zentrum Feb 2012 #13
Where are the Democratic men..... zentrum Feb 2012 #14
"Reid needs to hold a hearing on women's health." Beartracks Feb 2012 #21
I guarantee Democratic men are quite involved lunatica Feb 2012 #26
I find that to be a very sexist way of spooky3 Feb 2012 #33
Now I'm sexist?! lunatica Feb 2012 #37
Nobody is trying to "rescue" you... dogknob Feb 2012 #46
Maybe you should take your fight where it will actually be against the enemy lunatica Feb 2012 #51
Somebody, chervilant Feb 2012 #17
Well millions of women are telling him what ISN'T a real apology and his ISN'T. lunatica Feb 2012 #27
Well, chervilant Feb 2012 #31
Why are they acting like there are no liberal women clergy? intheflow Feb 2012 #19
Why are they acting as though the 'clergy' should make women's choices? csziggy Feb 2012 #41
I'm not disagreeing with you. intheflow Feb 2012 #48
Oh, they did allow two female religious persons to speak - later csziggy Feb 2012 #49
my stepdaughter is studying to be a Reform rabbi. The Orthodox and Conservative branches CTyankee Feb 2012 #55
there are many conservative female Rabbis waddirum Feb 2012 #56
Yes, you are right. I am not Jewish but was under the impression that this was still the case. CTyankee Feb 2012 #57
"when pictures only came in black and white.”? Bah! Cherchez la Femme Feb 2012 #20
Most of this argument isn't in the right place. Resolution requires that the 24601 Feb 2012 #23
"Mommy, what's that?" Occulus Feb 2012 #35
It was a serious post. Devolving into sexual humor doesn't do the issue justice. 24601 Feb 2012 #38
If the men gave birth and fed babies Rosa Luxemburg Feb 2012 #24
This is what women's rights is all about Alcibiades Feb 2012 #30
K&R unionworks Feb 2012 #40
Maybe the GOP needs is Boudica the Lyoness Feb 2012 #43
K&R Blue in Red State Feb 2012 #52
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Birth-Control Hearing Was...»Reply #58