Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Medicare for All, including dental and optical. Everything else is just window dressing. Scuba Aug 2013 #1
This is what I fear the most Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #19
Perhaps that was the idea. Scuba Aug 2013 #27
You are actively assisting Republicans in their goal. nt tridim Aug 2013 #40
Can you explain that, please? Scuba Aug 2013 #49
Yes, crim son Aug 2013 #58
It was an observation. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #68
If? We have a couple generations who have been awash in the idea that the jtuck004 Aug 2013 #102
Never mind government health care works jut fine in the rest of the world. RC Aug 2013 #46
Hear hear! BlueManFan Aug 2013 #62
+ infinity! n/t Lugnut Aug 2013 #63
''Everything else is just window dressing.'' DeSwiss Aug 2013 #69
Only if "window dressing" equals evil for profit Half-Century Man Aug 2013 #80
How would that effect the solvency of Medicare? Freddie Stubbs Aug 2013 #110
Tax the wealthy a little more ... Scuba Aug 2013 #111
Tax the super wealthy a LOT more wordpix Aug 2013 #116
Good idea, but will never happen in the USA unless the "peasants" revolt. ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #124
+1000, O-care is proving to be R-care; R for Repug and Repeal wordpix Aug 2013 #115
+1000 burnsei sensei Aug 2013 #134
"businesses need more time to figure out how to comply" Eric J in MN Aug 2013 #2
Thats exactly what I thought. n/t winterpark Aug 2013 #17
I'd give them until the end of the year atreides1 Aug 2013 #31
Don't be holding your breath. RC Aug 2013 #48
They can change their own policies in the time it takes lightning to flash, but Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #41
More likely time to figure how to dump their insurance plans zeemike Aug 2013 #74
Did the population get time to... Half-Century Man Aug 2013 #85
I wouldn't give them the time. christx30 Aug 2013 #113
I guess three Duckhunter935 Aug 2013 #3
Is it my imagination or does enlightenment Aug 2013 #4
I couldn't agree more. Ed Suspicious Aug 2013 #7
You are quite correct. another_liberal Aug 2013 #10
Don''t worry the chaos will worsen Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #16
100% pure FUD. Heartless, cold, disgusting. nt tridim Aug 2013 #39
That's how it looks to me, too. City Lights Aug 2013 #13
The edited version does not make sense, either Kolesar Aug 2013 #26
nah it`s not your imagination madrchsod Aug 2013 #28
It's definitely not your imagination Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #42
That's Obama in a nutshell. Protect the 1% at all costs. forestpath Aug 2013 #57
You noticed. They keep finding new ways to screw us. chimpymustgo Aug 2013 #131
bad products do not elicit burnsei sensei Aug 2013 #135
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you hobbit709 Aug 2013 #5
Yep... awoke_in_2003 Aug 2013 #109
Need more time to figure out how to comply? djean111 Aug 2013 #6
Premiums, co-pays and deductibles are ALREADY going down in states that have implemented the ACA tridim Aug 2013 #9
Oh, yes, going down for now. djean111 Aug 2013 #15
And for those of us in red states, our premiums are going UPPPPPP.... AllyCat Aug 2013 #66
Actually I believe them that they need more time but cstanleytech Aug 2013 #20
Universal health care should have been the goal Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #8
30 million newly insured poor people been snookered? tridim Aug 2013 #11
This will be stripped away as well Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #12
No, it will not. Period. tridim Aug 2013 #21
The Obama Administration obviously can do as they wish Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #29
The HHS/ACA website is a good use of time Kolesar Aug 2013 #33
It's a delay, not non-enforcement. Relax. tridim Aug 2013 #35
The fact the Obama administration seems to feel uncompelled to implement the law they passed? Chan790 Aug 2013 #114
uh, the waivers? Doctor_J Aug 2013 #142
Making stuff up. former9thward Aug 2013 #53
You are 100% wrong. tridim Aug 2013 #89
If a person has no "disposable income", then unless the government covers 100% of the cost hughee99 Aug 2013 #139
These people have a mandate to buy insurance from the same old crooks dflprincess Aug 2013 #128
People tried. They threw them in jail. RC Aug 2013 #72
I didn't think it could get any worse than it already was Cal Carpenter Aug 2013 #14
I work for an insurance company.. tridim Aug 2013 #24
Oh, for pity's sake. enlightenment Aug 2013 #45
Do you want 30 million poor people to have insurance, or not? tridim Aug 2013 #84
I would like 50 million people to have access to enlightenment Aug 2013 #91
So would I. What's your point? tridim Aug 2013 #94
Conversations like this enlightenment Aug 2013 #105
Do you want a unicorn? Chan790 Aug 2013 #117
Which would you rather have. zeemike Aug 2013 #77
If I were running the company, I would take my share of the 30 million new customers... tridim Aug 2013 #82
Sorry but what it sounds like to me is. zeemike Aug 2013 #98
Make up your mind--is the law an abomination or is the problem geek tragedy Aug 2013 #143
No surprise here Puzzledtraveller Aug 2013 #18
I am not as cynical as some....... Swede Atlanta Aug 2013 #22
I would have bought coverage with deductibles > $2000/year Kolesar Aug 2013 #23
That's nice and I'm happy for you. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #44
Subsidies! Kolesar Aug 2013 #47
I believe the subsidies help with the premiums, not with the deductibles. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #51
What's the deductible for Medicaid patients? Kolesar Aug 2013 #52
I don't know, but even if there is none, Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #56
slightly above that line gets one a 91% subsidy. Kolesar Aug 2013 #61
Sure, but what's the deductible? Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #120
Look it up at the ACA website ... eom Kolesar Aug 2013 #129
I did. That was a rhetorical question. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #132
Then buy the silver plan or the gold plan...eom Kolesar Aug 2013 #141
A lien on personal property is what covers Medicaid expenses DJ13 Aug 2013 #65
so how is care "affordable" under the PPACA, if you can't afford to get sick? nt antigop Aug 2013 #25
Good point Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #32
Do you want the ACA repealed? tridim Aug 2013 #38
Insurance may be affordable. djean111 Aug 2013 #34
I changed the title -- PPACA---> AFFORDABLE CARE ACT. antigop Aug 2013 #36
So, repeal the ACA? tridim Aug 2013 #37
No, stimulation Kolesar Aug 2013 #54
I'll take that as a yes. tridim Aug 2013 #87
Huh? Kolesar Aug 2013 #95
Stop with the Sophie's choice. djean111 Aug 2013 #60
I'll take that as a yes. tridim Aug 2013 #86
oh noes!!!!!! djean111 Aug 2013 #100
Good question. historylovr Aug 2013 #59
+10 RC Aug 2013 #75
Silly DUer, INSURANCE will be affordable. Medical care, not so much. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #73
for many the premiums will be unaffordable. Older people can be charged three times what a younger antigop Aug 2013 #88
I'm one of those "older people", so I am well aware. I qualify for a huge subsidy with my kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #107
can you get a teaching job or something -- something with healthcare? antigop Aug 2013 #108
A more relevant question that takes in yours is: burnsei sensei Aug 2013 #136
that's the problem I've had with the PPACA from day one. Medical bankruptcies will continue. antigop Aug 2013 #138
whittling it down, little by little. nt Javaman Aug 2013 #30
"businesses need more time to figure out how to comply with the new rules" - translation: Triana Aug 2013 #43
How so? Kolesar Aug 2013 #50
I'm sure they'll think of something. n/t Triana Aug 2013 #78
So WHO does Obama "care" about again? Because it certainly doesn't seem to be forestpath Aug 2013 #55
Here Kolesar Aug 2013 #64
Right-wing "news" sources cilla4progress Aug 2013 #67
Jesus Jumping Christ it's in the FUCKING FEDERAL REGISTER. Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #92
... cilla4progress Aug 2013 #119
NYT yesterday Skeeter Barnes Aug 2013 #97
Thanks. cilla4progress Aug 2013 #104
So, the question again...when do you think they will delay the refusal of pre-existing conditions? Safetykitten Aug 2013 #70
So now medical bankruptcies caused by lack of out-of-pocket kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #71
That's not what the article said Kolesar Aug 2013 #79
It seems to me they are trying to repeal all parts of the law that help THE PEOPLE loudsue Aug 2013 #76
"businesses" = corporate Obama and US government controllers. Is it funny yet? L0oniX Aug 2013 #81
They way things are going, I am beginning to wonder if Obama might repeal obamacare himself n2doc Aug 2013 #83
When do we get the affordable part? pediatricmedic Aug 2013 #90
wtf? "Businesses need more time...?" mike_c Aug 2013 #93
This Is Political Malpractice, Sir The Magistrate Aug 2013 #96
I agree Harmony Blue Aug 2013 #123
Since this part is delayed, so should the mandate be delayed TheProgressive Aug 2013 #99
Why am I not surprised area51 Aug 2013 #101
Sounds to me that they are pushing hard to delay implementation into 2016 in order to WCGreen Aug 2013 #103
wow the republicans can just sit back, obama will end up getting rid of obama care all by himself leftyohiolib Aug 2013 #106
It's really seeming like what he wanted was a sincere-looking effort and a failure... Chan790 Aug 2013 #118
...but the insurance companies have to return money of they make over 20% profit... Sancho Aug 2013 #112
A question for the ACA enthusiasts Jim Lane Aug 2013 #121
LOL Skittles Aug 2013 #122
starting to think Obamacare is a cruel joke /nt limpyhobbler Aug 2013 #125
what is left.. to rollback, other than the individual mandate? ..nt quadrature Aug 2013 #126
This is misleading in that a $2k deductible is the cap for an individual "silver" plan dflprincess Aug 2013 #127
Thanks for noting that...eom Kolesar Aug 2013 #130
As of this week, burnsei sensei Aug 2013 #133
It will not. You and I were sold to the insurance companies. The seller was The Democratic Party. Safetykitten Aug 2013 #137
We bought the tag lines, "access" Puzzledtraveller Aug 2013 #140
kick n/t area51 Aug 2013 #144
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Another Obamacare delay: ...»Reply #51