Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.K. Police Open Criminal Probe Based on Journalist's Seized Snowden Materials [View all]backscatter712
(26,357 posts)19. I do - copying files isn't that hard.
Trickier is planting stuff in his browsing history and cache to make it look like he's been surfing kiddie-porn stuff for a while - that requires a bit of database knowhow. Still, Firefox and Chrome use SQLite databases to store stuff like browsing history. And as Chrome and Firefox are open-source, digging up details of how these browsers do caching isn't hard.
Here's some of the details of how Chrome does it - http://www.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/network-stack/disk-cache
It's a bit technical, but I'm sure a three-letter government agency that specializes in digital snooping and hacking can find someone who can figure it out...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
40 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
U.K. Police Open Criminal Probe Based on Journalist's Seized Snowden Materials [View all]
bemildred
Aug 2013
OP
"... The High Court ruled the authorities could examine the seized material for the defence of
struggle4progress
Aug 2013
#39
They don't need child porn. This non-journalist was trafficking in dangerous stolen materials
uhnope
Aug 2013
#8
Since GG acknowledged that Miranda was a courier for Snowden docs, it's not exactly BS
uhnope
Aug 2013
#34
^^^This post (#8) is making declarative statements as if they're true. Don't take at face value.^^^
DisgustipatedinCA
Aug 2013
#29