Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Army: We won't provide transgender Manning with hormone treatment or sex reassignment surgery [View all]branford
(4,462 posts)81. Do you really believe that it is better to accuse others of ignorance
or malice and demand compliance? A simple, friendly request will almost always achieve much better results than a stern lecture.
Also, keep in mind that even Manning's attorneys referred to her as "he" until the last few days. We've been writing about Manning for months, and old habits die hard.
Be very careful not to alienate those who would otherwise agree with you. It does not help the cause.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Army: We won't provide transgender Manning with hormone treatment or sex reassignment surgery [View all]
Freddie Stubbs
Aug 2013
OP
Has anyone ever labelled you an ignorant bigot? If not, please allow me to be the first. You
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#53
It is not an illness. The surgery is, in fact, elective. That is why the prison will not provide it.
MjolnirTime
Aug 2013
#56
I have no trouble at all discerning bigotry when it shows its ugly face. Too
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#57
The more posts I reply to, the worse you look. You've said nothing but "bigot".
MjolnirTime
Aug 2013
#58
A jury bounced you on Trumad's thread for your bigotry. Keep it up and maybe a jury will do the
HardTimes99
Aug 2013
#64
wow. just shut your mouth, you're coming off as stupid (quoted from Step Brothers)
GalaxyHunter
Aug 2013
#74
Please, have a look at the article below. It will explain why 'anatomicaly male/female' doesn't
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#62
The article is about genetics (and anatomy) but it doesn't really matter. Chelsea is a woman, no
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#69
There will be many things that Private Manning cannot do in prison that have nothing to do with
24601
Aug 2013
#83
My understanding is that Manning will be dishonorably discharged after he serves his sentence.
branford
Aug 2013
#5
If this is what Manning really wants, then it's time to make a deal with the feds. nt
msanthrope
Aug 2013
#7
what if others give or raise money for this ? would they allow her to get the surgery
JI7
Aug 2013
#12
I certainly do not mean to be snarky, but the Army will determine what Manning "needs."
branford
Aug 2013
#16
Incarceration under military custody is not always comparable to the civilian system.
branford
Aug 2013
#21
I removed my post. It upset some people, but I believe that to be completely unjustified.
kestrel91316
Aug 2013
#27
Arseholes. Nice to know that US military openly denies treatment for genetic medical condition.
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#37
Frankly I don't give a shit. Gender identity disorder is a genetic medical condition and must be
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#42
It was not directed at you. Just my opinion about scum who would refuse medical treatment. Why
idwiyo
Aug 2013
#46
Jeralyn Merritt, at TalkLeft, has an informative comment about possible treatment for Manning.
branford
Aug 2013
#41
Remember, if something is issued by the US Government, it is NOT subject to Copywrite
happyslug
Aug 2013
#50