Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
Sun Aug 25, 2013, 07:20 PM Aug 2013

Nato members could act against Syria without UN mandate [View all]

Source: Guardian

Barack Obama is unlikely to have much trouble mustering a Nato coalition of the willing if Washington opts for military intervention in Syria in response to the alleged chemical weapons atrocities by the Assad regime.

There is, however, no prospect of a UN mandate for international military action over Syria – with the Kremlin, enraged at what it saw as abuse of a UN mandate to topple Muammar Gaddafi in Libya, certain to keep wielding its veto.

Turkey, which accounts for Nato's second largest army after the US, and which is on the frontline with Syria, bearing the brunt of the massive refugee crisis, is already a key conduit for arms supplies to, and a safe haven for, the sundry groups of fighters at war with Damascus.

It has been the loudest critic of the Assad regime, clamouring for the west to do more. In any international coalition Turkey would be likely to play a key role – with a potential impact on the country's own ethnic balance, especially the relations between the Sunni Muslim majority and the sizeable Alevi minority concentrated in the south near the Syrian border

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/aug/25/syria-un-mandate-nato-military-action

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Congressional Approval, No UN Mandate, No discussion Catherina Aug 2013 #1
In the case of the UK would also require a vote in parliament dipsydoodle Aug 2013 #3
Desperate and dying empires tend not... Mr_Jefferson_24 Aug 2013 #6
What's with the WWIII video? AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #9
I sincerely hope... Mr_Jefferson_24 Aug 2013 #10
Sorry, Mr. Jeff, but no. Just no. AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #11
Sorry, AverageJoe, but... Mr_Jefferson_24 Aug 2013 #18
Yes, I did watch the one you posted. AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #21
I think you're having a hard time... Mr_Jefferson_24 Aug 2013 #22
War on Syria: Gateway to WWIII, Free e-Book by Tony Cartalucci & Nile Bowie Snowfield Aug 2013 #16
Read the book.....while there is a little bit of decent information in there..... AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #19
let's face it, if the US wants to blow some shit up, shit will get blown up. KG Aug 2013 #2
Whatever our erstwhile allies agree to do in Syria . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #4
Why not ? warrant46 Aug 2013 #5
In a presidency riddled with fuck ups this could well become his greatest fuck up of all...... bowens43 Aug 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author CJCRANE Aug 2013 #8
So the Guardian is pre-blaming Obama to take the blame for another decade of war. freshwest Aug 2013 #12
Turkey says will join coalition against Syria even without UN consensus Bosonic Aug 2013 #13
Of course they can act--it's called Aggression Alamuti Lotus Aug 2013 #14
" a Nato coalition of the willing " even the wording is same as Iraq, they dont even pretend anymore Snowfield Aug 2013 #15
USA USA USA !!! warrant46 Aug 2013 #17
George says "Miss me yet?" Old Union Guy Aug 2013 #20
+1 nt fujiyama Aug 2013 #23
2003 called fujiyama Aug 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Nato members could act ag...