Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: U.S. Rebuffs Syrian Decision to Allow Inspection [View all]AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)42. Unfortunately, there may be some truth to this:
"If the Syrian government had nothing to hide and wanted to prove to the world that it had not used chemical weapons in this incident, it would have ceased its attacks on the area and granted immediate access to the U.N. five days ago," a senior administration official said.'
"At this juncture, the belated decision by the regime to grant access to the U.N. team is too late to be credible, including because the evidence available has been significantly corrupted as a result of the regime's persistent shelling and other intentional actions over the last five days," the official added.
I can't help but wonder just how far Assad might go to hide his government's possible complicity in these latest attacks; truth is, if he was that confident of being found not guilty.....well, you fill in the blank.
The most glaring piece of evidence pointing to something being quite amiss is the mention of shelling over the past few days; if nothing else, this was a terribly dumbassed move on the part of Damascus.....but there could be coverups going on, too......
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
51 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If it goes anything like the inspection in Iraq, won't matter what the inspectors report. nt
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#1
Daniel Ellsberg said presidents first decide to go to war, THEN find the pretext.
deurbano
Aug 2013
#8
I would love to hear him speak! Last speaker I heard was John Waters, and he was brilliant, but not
Mnemosyne
Aug 2013
#10
You mean like the chemical attack the UN believed the rebels launched that we dismissed?
Catherina
Aug 2013
#23
Following a 15 year MIC plan the neocons wrote in 2000. 7 countries in 5 years
Catherina
Aug 2013
#16
Wes Clark- lobbied Clinton to intervene in Kosovo & crafted strategy that won there.
KittyWampus
Aug 2013
#41
take a CORPSE and test it!! W/ atropine being a 'cure' I'm stating they are using pesticide chemical
Sunlei
Aug 2013
#19
same attitude to Palestine: "we'll give you statehood and democracy when you have statehood and
MisterP
Aug 2013
#25
And I don't think Putin's honest enough to even TRY, unless forced to. eom
AverageJoe90
Aug 2013
#43
There was never any women's rights, either. Or many other rights, for that matter.
AverageJoe90
Aug 2013
#44