Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Navy ready to launch first strike on Syria [View all] ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 OP
I wonder what the situation will be if Russia launches some cruise missiles Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #1
That is what I do not understand yoloisalie Aug 2013 #3
i find it funny iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #83
He will have basically declared war against the USA and most of Europe. branford Aug 2013 #18
Turkey wouldn't risk going to war with Russia. Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #23
Have you been listening to what's been coming out of Turkey lately? branford Aug 2013 #33
Not to mention that Russia's government is even more a tool of the 1% than ours is. It's entire stevenleser Aug 2013 #90
some awkward moments on the ISS. GreatCaesarsGhost Aug 2013 #70
unconstitutional OKDem08 Aug 2013 #2
It would not be unconstitutional. branford Aug 2013 #22
Democratic processes are so slow, you know.... maybe a bit of consulting ? jakeXT Aug 2013 #50
I think the president has a certain amount of time, a sort of leeway before he has to JDPriestly Aug 2013 #77
I wish there were a viable plan to simply and quickly capture or eliminate the chemical weapons branford Aug 2013 #80
Next stop--Iran. Jackpine Radical Aug 2013 #4
I just read something about the problem in Syria is Iranians. You can bet this is a ramp up. Ed Suspicious Aug 2013 #9
I think China will only offer perfunctory objections. branford Aug 2013 #25
The same way they reacted to the Iraq war and the intervention in Libya. Daniel537 Aug 2013 #39
One thing is majorly different this time. Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #52
If Russia intervened as you previously have suggested, branford Aug 2013 #58
Would we go to the mat to save one of our overseas bases? Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #66
You're really evading . . . branford Aug 2013 #68
I am telling you what my opinions are, I'm not evading anything. Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #69
We are discussing and evaluating American military policy in Syria. branford Aug 2013 #72
Russia would not proceed on a first strike military response Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #74
only if Iran wants iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #84
I totally support my president. jessie04 Aug 2013 #5
Really? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #7
Good Point. jessie04 Aug 2013 #11
Would you support boots on the ground? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #12
No , I would not. jessie04 Aug 2013 #14
One very BIG problem. branford Aug 2013 #27
And the alternative is accepting the use chemical weapons in war. jessie04 Aug 2013 #32
We accepted it when Saddam did it to the Kurds. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #38
Better question than that... jessie04 Aug 2013 #41
How many innocent people have we killed with drones? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #51
So it doesn't matter if a country uses biological or nuclear weapons ? jessie04 Aug 2013 #54
Most countries have formally agreed not to use chemical weapons. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #56
Good point. jessie04 Aug 2013 #57
Using your standards. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #59
I assume because we used a nuke 70 years ago? jessie04 Aug 2013 #61
Forgetting about napalm in Vietnam? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #62
I was having a normal discussion with you and pull that? jessie04 Aug 2013 #63
Pull what? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #64
Syria is a signed and ratified member of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. AtheistCrusader Aug 2013 #73
I'm not certain that military involvement, without the ability or committment branford Aug 2013 #40
I respect your opinion. jessie04 Aug 2013 #43
The Cheneys and other ilk like him send someone else to bleed and die warrant46 Aug 2013 #17
Enlisting? malokvale77 Aug 2013 #31
Who used them? former9thward Aug 2013 #8
Good point.... paleotn Aug 2013 #19
An expert here is saying those chemicals don't appear to be of military origin. Amonester Aug 2013 #53
Yes, and Germans supported Hitler 100% when Poland attacked them. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #34
+1 Daniel537 Aug 2013 #36
Isn't that analysis just a little too black and white? branford Aug 2013 #42
The fact that some of those rebel elements are Al-Qaida-linked is probably even more of a reason Daniel537 Aug 2013 #44
I don't really know who's in charge of the weapons now. branford Aug 2013 #55
So we remove Assad and then what? ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #60
Are we sure we know who used the chemical weapons? JDPriestly Aug 2013 #78
not about the president.. iamthebandfanman Aug 2013 #85
Thaaaaank you. jessie04 Aug 2013 #88
Why? GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #89
I guess 3 wars, and drone strikes in Yemen and Pakistan HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #6
We have elected a neo-con. Ed Suspicious Aug 2013 #10
2002 War Powers Given to Bush RobertEarl Aug 2013 #15
And THAT is why it cannot go unanswered. jessie04 Aug 2013 #16
Yeah so who you going to attack? MyNameGoesHere Aug 2013 #20
" NeoCon Obama" ?? jessie04 Aug 2013 #21
Walks like a duck... paleotn Aug 2013 #30
If the previous players were called neocons MyNameGoesHere Aug 2013 #91
Good Gawd, man! RobertEarl Aug 2013 #24
You'd lose that bet. jessie04 Aug 2013 #26
So RobertEarl Aug 2013 #35
No, not war. jessie04 Aug 2013 #47
Iraq invasion RobertEarl Aug 2013 #67
Against it...your turn jessie04 Aug 2013 #87
And we're still not completely sure... paleotn Aug 2013 #28
Could be Russia, Iran, or Israel too. HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #37
Just like everyone else, I have no idea which of the sides have used defacto7 Aug 2013 #81
I suspect a neo-con (Bush, McCain, Romney) would have attacked months (or years) ago. pampango Aug 2013 #86
k&r for exposure. This is rather important. n/t Laelth Aug 2013 #13
That's too bad. I don't doubt they will soon regret having done so. another_liberal Aug 2013 #29
Drones kill children = collateral damages Amonester Aug 2013 #45
Woohoo! progressoid Aug 2013 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author HooptieWagon Aug 2013 #48
At least someone made their homework jakeXT Aug 2013 #49
An attack will really upset the Venezuelans Zorro Aug 2013 #65
The most important question is this. ConcernedCanuk Aug 2013 #71
I fully support your President ! Sand Wind Aug 2013 #75
He hasn't even said his intentions yet. ForgoTheConsequence Aug 2013 #79
Al Qaeda really wants Obama to do this. David__77 Aug 2013 #82
This household votes no military intervention.. mountain grammy Aug 2013 #76
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Navy ready to launch firs...»Reply #26