Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NCagainstMcCrony

(47 posts)
37. Not likely
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 12:25 PM
Aug 2013

Big tobacco is buying up all the e-cig manufacturers. So I doubt your conclusion. More likely it is the holier than thou crowd like some of those here on DU who rail against e-cigs.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

hmmmm...wonder what msongs thinks of this development? ret5hd Aug 2013 #1
Looks like traditional tobacco companies are not going away without a Vinnie From Indy Aug 2013 #2
+1 JustAnotherGen Aug 2013 #5
Agreed AZ_lurker Aug 2013 #32
That was my first thought when reading the OP...What part do the tobacco companies truth2power Aug 2013 #15
As far as I know, no study has ever shown a link between nicotine and cancer. SylviaD Aug 2013 #23
But they have with formaldehyde and cancer. pnwmom Aug 2013 #42
Sounds like Big Tobacco paid for the study meow2u3 Aug 2013 #33
My e-cig has helped me quit smoking. I'll be 1 year without a cigarette in 2 weeks. winterpark Aug 2013 #34
+1000 Tom Ripley Aug 2013 #17
^^^THIS^^^ valerief Aug 2013 #36
Not likely NCagainstMcCrony Aug 2013 #37
Superb username! KamaAina Aug 2013 #40
No, they really aren't. beevul Aug 2013 #45
The traditional companies have already entered the market with their own products. pnwmom Aug 2013 #41
Life is carcinogenic. tridim Aug 2013 #3
Lol yoloisalie Aug 2013 #4
How about here? caseymoz Aug 2013 #8
There are plenty of articles, just no PR from the companies that make them. tridim Aug 2013 #9
And you've take an overview of company literature caseymoz Aug 2013 #18
Honestly, I don't care. You read WAY too much into my post. tridim Aug 2013 #21
"Potentially carcinogenic" to whom? The smoker? Eleanors38 Aug 2013 #6
Here it is simple: caseymoz Aug 2013 #11
Does that include nicotine gums and patches? yoloisalie Aug 2013 #14
Yes, it would. caseymoz Aug 2013 #22
Blatantly untrue. The gum comes in a variety of flavors, Live and Learn Aug 2013 #28
And they still don't taste good. caseymoz Sep 2013 #63
Yep, that char-broiled steak did it! Eleanors38 Aug 2013 #30
E-cigarettes do not ALL contain nicotine. Just a fact. jtuck004 Aug 2013 #35
Wrong. In fact no e-cigarette contains nicotine. caseymoz Sep 2013 #64
$6.99. No Nicotine. No cartridge. jtuck004 Sep 2013 #67
Or maybe I know a ripoff when I hear it. caseymoz Sep 2013 #69
The information about nicotine as a carcinogen is inconclusive Turborama Aug 2013 #38
Government weasel words. caseymoz Sep 2013 #65
Despite your weasel words, your problem is that you stated this definitively above Turborama Sep 2013 #66
There's skepticism, and then there's denial. caseymoz Sep 2013 #68
I'm not worried. I live in California, where EVERYTHING is carcinogenic. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #70
That's okay with me. caseymoz Sep 2013 #71
Bacon is potentially carcinogenic, too askeptic Aug 2013 #20
Science is just another OP. Eleanors38 Aug 2013 #31
Good point NCagainstMcCrony Aug 2013 #39
They found formaldehyde in the vapor of some of the e-cigs, pnwmom Aug 2013 #43
Didn't know they were presented as "harmless" Bradical79 Aug 2013 #7
well, wait. What we know for sure: tobacco products cause cancer.. mountain grammy Aug 2013 #10
As long as they only give christx30 Aug 2013 #12
These are the same idiots who said Cannabis is more toxic than cigarettes. bunnies Aug 2013 #13
Ya know...I can say is "Well, I am not surprised." MADem Aug 2013 #16
Wrong. Drahthaardogs Aug 2013 #56
Whatever gets you through the night... nt MADem Aug 2013 #58
As a toxicologist, SCIENCE gets me through the night. Drahthaardogs Aug 2013 #59
I'm an astronaut. MADem Aug 2013 #60
You source an article that in in vitro Drahthaardogs Aug 2013 #61
and on folow uo Drahthaardogs Aug 2013 #62
Horrible article, it masquarades as if it has new data Kurska Aug 2013 #19
Yeah ...like our government is "potentially" dangerous. It's just bullshit framing. n/t L0oniX Aug 2013 #26
old nasty stinkie ciggie CORP must be losing sales. whats the matter. not enough 3rd worlders tohook Sunlei Aug 2013 #24
Use them to quit cigs then after a few months quit the E-cigs. Keep them for emergencys. L0oniX Aug 2013 #25
More research, of course, but that's a lousy article bhikkhu Aug 2013 #27
Hold on. Very misleading article. Live and Learn Aug 2013 #29
Hmmmmmm, BillyRibs Aug 2013 #44
As opposed to tobacco cigarettes which are "highly carcinogenic"? jmowreader Aug 2013 #46
Better stick with regular cigarettes, then Spirochete Aug 2013 #47
Old study with faulty conclusions USAF Brat Aug 2013 #48
+1000 Excellent information! Live and Learn Aug 2013 #50
I'm sorry I didn't respond sooner USAF Brat Aug 2013 #54
Thank you for the link. More good info. nt Live and Learn Aug 2013 #57
"Potentially carcinogenic" is a lot better than definitely carcinogenic fujiyama Aug 2013 #49
Isnt just about everything "Potentially carcinogenic" be it exposure to the sun cstanleytech Aug 2013 #52
I've pointed out they still deliver nicotine in harmful amounts Warpy Aug 2013 #51
Here's a study showing no harmful effects on the heart: USAF Brat Aug 2013 #53
What nicotine does is cause smooth muscle to contract Warpy Aug 2013 #55
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Report: e-cigarettes are ...»Reply #37