Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

upi402

(16,854 posts)
6. I suspect he was irrelevant to you before well that
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 06:47 PM
Aug 2013

Even though Kucinich was right all along. Still likely IS right.
The fact that he's irrelevant is is due to fools drinkin' the Kool Aid and allowing the corporatrist bullshit.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kucinich became irrelevant when he started taking a paycheck from Fox BainsBane Aug 2013 #1
Well think of Kucinich on faux news as speaking from behind snappyturtle Aug 2013 #3
Yes, he is dead on. If we're supporting the rebels we're supporting al Qaeda. truth2power Aug 2013 #18
This has nothing to do with either Google Syria oil pipeline. JRLeft Aug 2013 #49
It has to do with both. One is about who we support in our march truth2power Aug 2013 #57
I agree, we never gave a damn about the 5,000 people who were killed a month previously for the last JRLeft Aug 2013 #58
I suspect he was irrelevant to you before well that upi402 Aug 2013 #6
He's the one taking the big corporate paycheck BainsBane Aug 2013 #7
He had more principals than becoming a lobbyist, like most do. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #10
Working for FOX News Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #44
it's unfortunate that he doesn't command six-figure speaking engagements, like the clintons frylock Aug 2013 #20
Not really surprising leftynyc Aug 2013 #48
it's fucking true, don't care who says it elehhhhna Aug 2013 #13
Actually it's not true BainsBane Aug 2013 #15
He didn't become a douchebag lobbyist for an MIC corporations Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #21
Shameful for Kucinich to oversimplify the issue (lie) in this way. He's lost it totally. uhnope Aug 2013 #22
Did MSNBC (aka General Electric Military-Industrial-Complex-Speak) Offer Him a Spot?? HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #33
I love this argument that he deserved to be handed a highly paid gig BainsBane Aug 2013 #41
Not "Overly Simplistic" - More Like "Straight To The Point" HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #47
He just made himself VERY relevant as he is speaking the truth. I guess the truth IS sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #40
No, not really. The Stranger Aug 2013 #52
To you maybe, but you hardly speak for everyone. kucinich is on-the-mark here. NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #56
Tell me where I claimed to speak for everyone? BainsBane Aug 2013 #64
Nah, I think he was irrelevant even before that. Pterodactyl Aug 2013 #62
Well why not ? We gave them support 30 years ago we can renew an old Contract warrant46 Aug 2013 #2
So Obama shared with Kucinich what he's going to do? babylonsister Aug 2013 #4
bump... nt Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #5
Agree with Kucinich. adieu Aug 2013 #8
Agree. It would be treason and giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda. David__77 Aug 2013 #9
There will be blowback. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #11
I think it unwise to attack al Qaeda with chemical weapons, myself. joshcryer Aug 2013 #25
I don't think the US will do that, unless you count phosphorus, etc. David__77 Aug 2013 #26
I think government forces launched the weapons against al Qaeda. joshcryer Aug 2013 #28
The US should stand back from this. David__77 Aug 2013 #29
That's why I feel this has already played out. joshcryer Aug 2013 #31
This is such a mess. David__77 Aug 2013 #32
Completely agree with that. joshcryer Aug 2013 #34
Off topic, somewhat... David__77 Aug 2013 #35
Fair enough. And you shouldn't forget Israel did strike Syria. joshcryer Aug 2013 #36
Also how Egypt factors in will be interesting. David__77 Aug 2013 #38
We don't negotiate with terriorists, but we do give them air cover elehhhhna Aug 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Aug 2013 #14
Syria could use nukes and Kucinich would be against any response. jessie04 Aug 2013 #16
Kucinich was right from the beginning about Iraq. One of the few, sadly. I wish he had sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #42
WW1 started three years before the US got involved telclaven Aug 2013 #51
To basically write off the entirety of the rebels as al-Qaeda is as foolish WatermelonRat Aug 2013 #17
Who are these "liberal" insurgents in Syria? David__77 Aug 2013 #39
The Syrian people want these Extremists out of their country. Have you been following this sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #43
Again, it's much more complicated than that. WatermelonRat Aug 2013 #50
Of course it's more complicated than can be written in a comment here. But the US media sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #54
complicated mishmash of rebel groups - pres should consult with Congress, UN, everyone before wordpix Aug 2013 #19
That's a zingy little meme you got there, Dennis! nt GliderGuider Aug 2013 #23
Kucinich has a way of cutting through the fog and getting to the heart of the issue. Obama is Monk06 Aug 2013 #24
Kucinich needs to just go away. Like Ralph Nader Gman Aug 2013 #27
And Then? Who Would Speak for Real Democrats? HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #37
Real Democrats? Gman Aug 2013 #46
Obama speaks for Democrats of course. Democrats overwhelmingly voted for him. Pterodactyl Aug 2013 #63
No kidding. CanSocDem Aug 2013 #45
K&R NealK Aug 2013 #30
Over-the-top hyperbole. Amonester Aug 2013 #53
That is not helpful treestar Aug 2013 #55
Never signed the treaty against CBUs warrant46 Aug 2013 #59
Putting it that way will make Faux heads explode!! Myrina Aug 2013 #60
There he goes again! bvar22 Aug 2013 #61
Well, if KUCINICH says it's wrong..... brooklynite Aug 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kucinich: Syria Strike Wo...»Reply #6