Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(57,651 posts)
7. He's the one taking the big corporate paycheck
Tue Aug 27, 2013, 06:48 PM
Aug 2013

Not me. Pretty ironic that you defend someone in Fox's pocket by assuming anyone who doesn't like that has drunk corporate Kool-Aid. That's not even logical. So sorry I insulted your favorite Fox-bot.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Kucinich became irrelevant when he started taking a paycheck from Fox BainsBane Aug 2013 #1
Well think of Kucinich on faux news as speaking from behind snappyturtle Aug 2013 #3
Yes, he is dead on. If we're supporting the rebels we're supporting al Qaeda. truth2power Aug 2013 #18
This has nothing to do with either Google Syria oil pipeline. JRLeft Aug 2013 #49
It has to do with both. One is about who we support in our march truth2power Aug 2013 #57
I agree, we never gave a damn about the 5,000 people who were killed a month previously for the last JRLeft Aug 2013 #58
I suspect he was irrelevant to you before well that upi402 Aug 2013 #6
He's the one taking the big corporate paycheck BainsBane Aug 2013 #7
He had more principals than becoming a lobbyist, like most do. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #10
Working for FOX News Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #44
it's unfortunate that he doesn't command six-figure speaking engagements, like the clintons frylock Aug 2013 #20
Not really surprising leftynyc Aug 2013 #48
it's fucking true, don't care who says it elehhhhna Aug 2013 #13
Actually it's not true BainsBane Aug 2013 #15
He didn't become a douchebag lobbyist for an MIC corporations Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #21
Shameful for Kucinich to oversimplify the issue (lie) in this way. He's lost it totally. uhnope Aug 2013 #22
Did MSNBC (aka General Electric Military-Industrial-Complex-Speak) Offer Him a Spot?? HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #33
I love this argument that he deserved to be handed a highly paid gig BainsBane Aug 2013 #41
Not "Overly Simplistic" - More Like "Straight To The Point" HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #47
He just made himself VERY relevant as he is speaking the truth. I guess the truth IS sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #40
No, not really. The Stranger Aug 2013 #52
To you maybe, but you hardly speak for everyone. kucinich is on-the-mark here. NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #56
Tell me where I claimed to speak for everyone? BainsBane Aug 2013 #64
Nah, I think he was irrelevant even before that. Pterodactyl Aug 2013 #62
Well why not ? We gave them support 30 years ago we can renew an old Contract warrant46 Aug 2013 #2
So Obama shared with Kucinich what he's going to do? babylonsister Aug 2013 #4
bump... nt Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #5
Agree with Kucinich. adieu Aug 2013 #8
Agree. It would be treason and giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda. David__77 Aug 2013 #9
There will be blowback. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #11
I think it unwise to attack al Qaeda with chemical weapons, myself. joshcryer Aug 2013 #25
I don't think the US will do that, unless you count phosphorus, etc. David__77 Aug 2013 #26
I think government forces launched the weapons against al Qaeda. joshcryer Aug 2013 #28
The US should stand back from this. David__77 Aug 2013 #29
That's why I feel this has already played out. joshcryer Aug 2013 #31
This is such a mess. David__77 Aug 2013 #32
Completely agree with that. joshcryer Aug 2013 #34
Off topic, somewhat... David__77 Aug 2013 #35
Fair enough. And you shouldn't forget Israel did strike Syria. joshcryer Aug 2013 #36
Also how Egypt factors in will be interesting. David__77 Aug 2013 #38
We don't negotiate with terriorists, but we do give them air cover elehhhhna Aug 2013 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Aug 2013 #14
Syria could use nukes and Kucinich would be against any response. jessie04 Aug 2013 #16
Kucinich was right from the beginning about Iraq. One of the few, sadly. I wish he had sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #42
WW1 started three years before the US got involved telclaven Aug 2013 #51
To basically write off the entirety of the rebels as al-Qaeda is as foolish WatermelonRat Aug 2013 #17
Who are these "liberal" insurgents in Syria? David__77 Aug 2013 #39
The Syrian people want these Extremists out of their country. Have you been following this sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #43
Again, it's much more complicated than that. WatermelonRat Aug 2013 #50
Of course it's more complicated than can be written in a comment here. But the US media sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #54
complicated mishmash of rebel groups - pres should consult with Congress, UN, everyone before wordpix Aug 2013 #19
That's a zingy little meme you got there, Dennis! nt GliderGuider Aug 2013 #23
Kucinich has a way of cutting through the fog and getting to the heart of the issue. Obama is Monk06 Aug 2013 #24
Kucinich needs to just go away. Like Ralph Nader Gman Aug 2013 #27
And Then? Who Would Speak for Real Democrats? HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #37
Real Democrats? Gman Aug 2013 #46
Obama speaks for Democrats of course. Democrats overwhelmingly voted for him. Pterodactyl Aug 2013 #63
No kidding. CanSocDem Aug 2013 #45
K&R NealK Aug 2013 #30
Over-the-top hyperbole. Amonester Aug 2013 #53
That is not helpful treestar Aug 2013 #55
Never signed the treaty against CBUs warrant46 Aug 2013 #59
Putting it that way will make Faux heads explode!! Myrina Aug 2013 #60
There he goes again! bvar22 Aug 2013 #61
Well, if KUCINICH says it's wrong..... brooklynite Aug 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kucinich: Syria Strike Wo...»Reply #7