Latest Breaking News

Fuddnik

(8,846 posts)

10. He had more principals than becoming a lobbyist, like most do.

Reply to BainsBane (Reply #7)

Tue Aug 27, 2013, 07:17 PM

Aug 2013

Why didn't any of the mainstream media offer him a job?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kucinich: Syria Strike Would Turn US Into 'Al Qaeda's Air Force' [View all] big_dog Aug 2013 OP

Kucinich became irrelevant when he started taking a paycheck from Fox BainsBane Aug 2013 #1

Well think of Kucinich on faux news as speaking from behind snappyturtle Aug 2013 #3

Yes, he is dead on. If we're supporting the rebels we're supporting al Qaeda. truth2power Aug 2013 #18

This has nothing to do with either Google Syria oil pipeline. JRLeft Aug 2013 #49

It has to do with both. One is about who we support in our march truth2power Aug 2013 #57

I agree, we never gave a damn about the 5,000 people who were killed a month previously for the last JRLeft Aug 2013 #58

I suspect he was irrelevant to you before well that upi402 Aug 2013 #6

He's the one taking the big corporate paycheck BainsBane Aug 2013 #7

He had more principals than becoming a lobbyist, like most do. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #10

Working for FOX News Summer Hathaway Aug 2013 #44

it's unfortunate that he doesn't command six-figure speaking engagements, like the clintons frylock Aug 2013 #20

Not really surprising leftynyc Aug 2013 #48

it's fucking true, don't care who says it elehhhhna Aug 2013 #13

Actually it's not true BainsBane Aug 2013 #15

He didn't become a douchebag lobbyist for an MIC corporations Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #21

Shameful for Kucinich to oversimplify the issue (lie) in this way. He's lost it totally. uhnope Aug 2013 #22

Did MSNBC (aka General Electric Military-Industrial-Complex-Speak) Offer Him a Spot?? HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #33

I love this argument that he deserved to be handed a highly paid gig BainsBane Aug 2013 #41

Not "Overly Simplistic" - More Like "Straight To The Point" HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #47

He just made himself VERY relevant as he is speaking the truth. I guess the truth IS sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #40

No, not really. The Stranger Aug 2013 #52

To you maybe, but you hardly speak for everyone. kucinich is on-the-mark here. NorthCarolina Aug 2013 #56

Tell me where I claimed to speak for everyone? BainsBane Aug 2013 #64

Nah, I think he was irrelevant even before that. Pterodactyl Aug 2013 #62

Well why not ? We gave them support 30 years ago we can renew an old Contract warrant46 Aug 2013 #2

So Obama shared with Kucinich what he's going to do? babylonsister Aug 2013 #4

bump... nt Jesus Malverde Aug 2013 #5

Agree with Kucinich. adieu Aug 2013 #8

Agree. It would be treason and giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda. David__77 Aug 2013 #9

There will be blowback. Fuddnik Aug 2013 #11

I think it unwise to attack al Qaeda with chemical weapons, myself. joshcryer Aug 2013 #25

I don't think the US will do that, unless you count phosphorus, etc. David__77 Aug 2013 #26

I think government forces launched the weapons against al Qaeda. joshcryer Aug 2013 #28

The US should stand back from this. David__77 Aug 2013 #29

That's why I feel this has already played out. joshcryer Aug 2013 #31

This is such a mess. David__77 Aug 2013 #32

Completely agree with that. joshcryer Aug 2013 #34

Off topic, somewhat... David__77 Aug 2013 #35

Fair enough. And you shouldn't forget Israel did strike Syria. joshcryer Aug 2013 #36

Also how Egypt factors in will be interesting. David__77 Aug 2013 #38

We don't negotiate with terriorists, but we do give them air cover elehhhhna Aug 2013 #12

This message was self-deleted by its author big_dog Aug 2013 #14

Syria could use nukes and Kucinich would be against any response. jessie04 Aug 2013 #16

Kucinich was right from the beginning about Iraq. One of the few, sadly. I wish he had sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #42

WW1 started three years before the US got involved telclaven Aug 2013 #51

To basically write off the entirety of the rebels as al-Qaeda is as foolish WatermelonRat Aug 2013 #17

Who are these "liberal" insurgents in Syria? David__77 Aug 2013 #39

The Syrian people want these Extremists out of their country. Have you been following this sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #43

Again, it's much more complicated than that. WatermelonRat Aug 2013 #50

Of course it's more complicated than can be written in a comment here. But the US media sabrina 1 Aug 2013 #54

complicated mishmash of rebel groups - pres should consult with Congress, UN, everyone before wordpix Aug 2013 #19

That's a zingy little meme you got there, Dennis! nt GliderGuider Aug 2013 #23

Kucinich has a way of cutting through the fog and getting to the heart of the issue. Obama is Monk06 Aug 2013 #24

Kucinich needs to just go away. Like Ralph Nader Gman Aug 2013 #27

And Then? Who Would Speak for Real Democrats? HumansAndResources Aug 2013 #37

Real Democrats? Gman Aug 2013 #46

Obama speaks for Democrats of course. Democrats overwhelmingly voted for him. Pterodactyl Aug 2013 #63

No kidding. CanSocDem Aug 2013 #45

K&R NealK Aug 2013 #30

Over-the-top hyperbole. Amonester Aug 2013 #53

That is not helpful treestar Aug 2013 #55

Never signed the treaty against CBUs warrant46 Aug 2013 #59

Putting it that way will make Faux heads explode!! Myrina Aug 2013 #60

There he goes again! bvar22 Aug 2013 #61

Well, if KUCINICH says it's wrong..... brooklynite Aug 2013 #65