Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: US: Assad responsible even if didn't order gas attack [View all]Celefin
(532 posts)9. Uh-huh...
"The commander in chief of any military is ultimately responsible for the decisions made under their leadership, even if... he's not the one that pushes the button, or says 'Go' on this," she told a press briefing.
Now there's a dangerous sentence. Of course it will never officially apply to our side, but still...
And why the rush? No time to wait for the inspectors, secret proof, now also no need for proof, just the need to act as quickly as possible without saying anything about what ultimately is to be achieved by said action, except for teaching someone a 'lesson'.
It's indeed not like Iraq, it's already a lot weirder.
Since war seems inevitable now, let's hope that by some magical incident 'we' end up supporting the least bad side. Not getting my hopes up, though.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"... President Assad responsible for the use of chemical weapons by his regime ..."
pampango
Aug 2013
#3
Actually, Bush conducted offensive bombing of Iraq (not just the continuing NFZ) starting
pampango
Aug 2013
#43
This is code for that they know that there was no order to do this by the government.
David__77
Aug 2013
#4
This is as insane as "Dr. Strangelove"- crazy Maj. Ripper sets off WW3 to protect precious bodily
leveymg
Aug 2013
#6
That would be an absolutely identical thing from the perspective of int'l law.
David__77
Aug 2013
#19
Hm... cluster bombs are banned for violating the GC by treaty binding 103 countries.
Celefin
Aug 2013
#34
Disgusting and incredibly stupid for us to suggest such a thing. There exists NO agreement
Jefferson23
Aug 2013
#23
"The commander in chief of any military is ultimately responsible for the decisions made under their
Earth_First
Aug 2013
#33