Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What if troops under ASSad DIDN'T deploy the weapons? Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #1
"... President Assad responsible for the use of chemical weapons by his regime ..." pampango Aug 2013 #3
Will they be honest with us if AQ DID do it? Cooley Hurd Aug 2013 #5
If Obama is the same as Bush, he won't be honest with us. pampango Aug 2013 #22
Remember this Guy and the WMD nerve gas of Saddam warrant46 Aug 2013 #35
Not really. ozone_man Aug 2013 #36
Did not expect this of John Kerry. tblue Aug 2013 #38
Actually, Bush conducted offensive bombing of Iraq (not just the continuing NFZ) starting pampango Aug 2013 #43
Can you listen to your John2 Aug 2013 #44
Hang on tight! Here comes the spinning. nt snappyturtle Aug 2013 #2
This is code for that they know that there was no order to do this by the government. David__77 Aug 2013 #4
Good insight. another_liberal Aug 2013 #18
This is as insane as "Dr. Strangelove"- crazy Maj. Ripper sets off WW3 to protect precious bodily leveymg Aug 2013 #6
Does this signal that the DOJ is going to remove Downwinder Aug 2013 #7
No, no, no, no . . . another_liberal Aug 2013 #12
If I were the Iraqi woman's lawyer I would be back in Downwinder Aug 2013 #15
Oh hell yes! another_liberal Aug 2013 #16
Yes yes, we know and Saddam attacked the world trade center. MyNameGoesHere Aug 2013 #8
Uh-huh... Celefin Aug 2013 #9
So we do have "regime change" in mind as our goal? another_liberal Aug 2013 #10
Hell, US president aren't even responsible what they *do* order MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #11
President Obama, meet Staff Sgt. Bales. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2013 #13
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #17
That would be an absolutely identical thing from the perspective of int'l law. David__77 Aug 2013 #19
Once they made it easy to wage war, everyone found it acceptable. Arctic Dave Aug 2013 #20
That's why "WMDs" freak them out so much. David__77 Aug 2013 #21
Not exactly. Targeted killing is reserved by all states. joshcryer Aug 2013 #28
Differences noted. However... David__77 Aug 2013 #29
A country that refuses to sign treaties that ban horrific weapons JoeyT Aug 2013 #31
When did I say "it totally doesn't apply to us"? joshcryer Aug 2013 #40
Hm... cluster bombs are banned for violating the GC by treaty binding 103 countries. Celefin Aug 2013 #34
In non-signatory states, I think it would. joshcryer Aug 2013 #41
What a convenient thing to say right after W. gets immunity! icymist Aug 2013 #14
It's a stupid thing to say. Igel Aug 2013 #26
Disgusting and incredibly stupid for us to suggest such a thing. There exists NO agreement Jefferson23 Aug 2013 #23
this is stupid, this is like saying if we decide to strike it will be Hagel JI7 Aug 2013 #24
You should probably let the CIA know about your sources Nevernose Aug 2013 #39
zero GeorgeGist Aug 2013 #25
Wow...this is worse than Bush at least pretending Saddam had nukes. dkf Aug 2013 #27
Wow. I had forgotten how much I hate Yahoo news. Laelth Aug 2013 #30
We'll be greeted as liberators! JoeyT Aug 2013 #32
"The commander in chief of any military is ultimately responsible for the decisions made under their Earth_First Aug 2013 #33
K&R DeSwiss Aug 2013 #37
Translation daleo Aug 2013 #42
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US: Assad responsible eve...»Reply #11