Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

24601

(4,132 posts)
184. This case involved whether a Florida resident had broken Florida state law. The State's
Thu Aug 29, 2013, 03:11 AM
Aug 2013

Attorney was appointed to the case by the Florida Governor.

The only federal involvement was an FBI investigation that determined that Martin's tragic death [my characterization] was not the race-based. From the

"What's more, charging Zimmerman under federal hate-crimes law would defy the findings of the FBI's own
investigation conducted last year. All told, agents interviewed no fewer than 45 Zimmerman co-workers,
neighbors and other acquaintances — including even his ex-fiance — and found no evidence of racial bias."

[Above quote from the Investor's Business Daily: http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/071513-663808-fbi-report-undermines-race-case-against-zimmerman.htm]

With President Obama's & AG Holder's FBI finding no racial motive, the inference I draw is that it's not likely that there is a federal case there.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh, he's guilty all right. Scuba Aug 2013 #1
I said "officially". n/t Old Union Guy Aug 2013 #3
Yeah and watch the friggin state of Florida pay it gopiscrap Aug 2013 #2
Money Collected? my2sense Aug 2013 #4
this has to come from Florida Tax Payers doesn't it ? JI7 Aug 2013 #5
They'll need to institute a state income tax if they keep acquitting all these SYG assholes....! nt MADem Aug 2013 #7
+1000 Tom Ripley Aug 2013 #67
This case involved whether a Florida resident had broken Florida state law. The State's 24601 Aug 2013 #184
Talk about nerve. hobbit709 Aug 2013 #6
Did/Does CA law require that they pay for it? Mr_Teg Aug 2013 #34
Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #8
No, you're right. It's the law and he gets it. I think people have trouble stomaching it though. nolabear Aug 2013 #9
I'm certainly not fan of Zimmerman, but I often find many of the comments about him disturbing. branford Aug 2013 #10
the man got away with murder and is a PROVEN THREAT to society Skittles Aug 2013 #13
I am most definitely not seeking any sympathy for Zimmerman. branford Aug 2013 #14
the poor thing has to fear the very thing he was so willing to practice Skittles Aug 2013 #15
That is exactly my point. branford Aug 2013 #16
correct, no one SHOULD Skittles Aug 2013 #17
Zimmerman apologists billh58 Aug 2013 #135
I am sick of it Skittles Aug 2013 #145
"No one, even Zimmerman, should have to worry about vigilantes."..... Little Star Aug 2013 #88
+10000 I was just gonna... one_voice Aug 2013 #103
+20000 Thats where I'm at! Fuck him. Little Star Aug 2013 #112
Helpful Hint: You've overused the whole "abandoning liberal values" thing. Paladin Aug 2013 #99
+100 nt grasswire Aug 2013 #104
+10000 noiretextatique Aug 2013 #120
+1000000 JustAnotherGen Aug 2013 #132
But they never billh58 Aug 2013 #136
CORRECT Skittles Aug 2013 #146
This is the first time I've agreed with anything you've written cpwm17 Aug 2013 #25
what GZ had to go through? Skittles Aug 2013 #39
OMG I literally spit coffee on my keyboard!! Sheldon Cooper Aug 2013 #42
"What an embezzle! What an ultramaroon!" greiner3 Aug 2013 #47
What a brilliant reply cpwm17 Aug 2013 #53
hilarious what offends you Skittles Aug 2013 #147
+1000 noiretextatique Aug 2013 #124
COUGH DonCoquixote Aug 2013 #86
Nobody has come close to proving GZ provoked the assault cpwm17 Aug 2013 #111
He didn't have that backpack JustAnotherGen Aug 2013 #133
Yes, I understand that cpwm17 Aug 2013 #137
whatever noiretextatique Aug 2013 #134
It's impossible for us to know that GZ was responsible cpwm17 Aug 2013 #139
who cares if they were or were not angels? Skittles Aug 2013 #148
People have a right to observe what they believe is suspicious behavior cpwm17 Aug 2013 #150
only fools believe zimmerman's story...and racists noiretextatique Aug 2013 #157
CORRECT Skittles Aug 2013 #163
Personal insults do not replace evidence cpwm17 Aug 2013 #177
OMG OMG OMG Skittles Aug 2013 #182
A seventeen year old teenager is more likely to attack a man than vis-versa cpwm17 Aug 2013 #171
oh PLEASE Skittles Aug 2013 #162
That's some loaded language cpwm17 Aug 2013 #172
No body came close to proving that GZ was attacked. All we had was his word for it... 1monster Aug 2013 #181
Believe the word was "Goons", not "Coons" as Goons was the moniker of the local gang. 24601 Aug 2013 #149
what the HELL are you smoking? niyad Aug 2013 #92
That isn't what makes him guilty. Zoeisright Aug 2013 #97
gun humpers got what they wanted and they're STILL not satisfied Skittles Aug 2013 #127
there was absolutely ZERO evidence that zimmerman, an ARMED cop wannabee noiretextatique Aug 2013 #122
I do agree that the revelations are disturbing Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #110
This message was self-deleted by its author obama2terms Aug 2013 #138
I'd have to agree. Not happy about it, but he was acquitted. Xyzse Aug 2013 #65
The law only covers expenses, not legal fees. branford Aug 2013 #68
That's something at least Xyzse Aug 2013 #71
I would certainly be curious to read the itemized expense reports. branford Aug 2013 #75
Yeah, itemized expense reports can be interesting sometimes Xyzse Aug 2013 #77
If I had to guess, copies and transcripts for so many lawyers and possibly the press. branford Aug 2013 #78
I would have considered that part of Lawyer fees Xyzse Aug 2013 #80
Unfortunately, no. branford Aug 2013 #82
"You would feint..." shugah Aug 2013 #164
I hope there were associates with dictionaries at that law firm, reviewing your work. Paladin Aug 2013 #167
Oh my, when all Paladin has to say concerns a poster's spelling, I know he's at a loss. n/t X_Digger Aug 2013 #168
I think if you review this thread really REALLY carefully..... Paladin Aug 2013 #169
I'm sorry, I should have said, "something substantive". Thanks! n/t X_Digger Aug 2013 #170
Couldn't agree with you more. Paladin Aug 2013 #176
When was the last time you had something other than snark on this issue? I'm being honest here. X_Digger Aug 2013 #178
You keep putting them over the plate, I'm going to hit them out of the park. Paladin Aug 2013 #179
Bitter little snark in lieu of actual conversation. *smh* n/t X_Digger Aug 2013 #180
What do you mean another "run of the mill minority defendant"? Chakab Aug 2013 #20
I was being slightly sarcastic. branford Aug 2013 #23
You keep saying you don't support Zman, yet in every post on him you do. Hoyt Aug 2013 #24
You really cannot be that dense or stubborn? branford Aug 2013 #31
rule of law Skittles Aug 2013 #35
It's obvious Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #61
THANK YOU Skittles Aug 2013 #33
Fact is? Oh dear.. PorridgeGun Aug 2013 #70
Ahh looks to me like you need a break HangOnKids Aug 2013 #90
Oh my. Kingofalldems Aug 2013 #161
Fact is, PGun Carolina Aug 2013 #96
But but but isn't PorridgeGun a cute name? HangOnKids Aug 2013 #165
Fact is.... RoccoR5955 Aug 2013 #143
People who support Zimmerman billh58 Aug 2013 #140
+1000. (nt) Paladin Aug 2013 #144
you know, as opposed to the paranoid racist gun humpers who have REASONS for breaking the law Skittles Aug 2013 #40
well.... noiretextatique Aug 2013 #123
You are assuming that a minority defendant would avebury Aug 2013 #36
I would never claim it happens very often, but it certainly does occur. branford Aug 2013 #37
You are assuming that a minority defendant would have been acquitted. yeoman6987 Aug 2013 #45
One of the things that came out in our "discussions" about Florida and SYG hack89 Aug 2013 #49
You would be wrong. GreenStormCloud Aug 2013 #160
Do we have a "Nation of Laws" or do we have "A Nation of Men" warrant46 Aug 2013 #54
some laws simply seem to favor paranoid gun humping racists Skittles Aug 2013 #121
Most of them favor economic expansion and continue the MIC warrant46 Aug 2013 #131
uhhhhhhhhhh Skittles Aug 2013 #141
Sorry warrant46 Aug 2013 #156
I think that means he's putting you on ignore so he won't see anymore of your posts. blueridge3210 Aug 2013 #158
That's too bad warrant46 Aug 2013 #159
+1 Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #57
Time for a taxpayer riot. nt onehandle Aug 2013 #11
f*** that murdering piece of shit Skittles Aug 2013 #12
This is just a vile post Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #62
LOLOL Skittles Aug 2013 #115
Hey Stella! Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #118
UM NO Skittles Aug 2013 #119
I agree with you, Skittles Carolina Aug 2013 #98
No, Skittles, let Florida pay his legal costs. Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #106
THEY DID BRING APPROPRIATE CHARGES Skittles Aug 2013 #116
most appropriate response noiretextatique Aug 2013 #125
One has to be indigent for the state to pay attorney fees... Deep13 Aug 2013 #18
No wonder they have The Wizard Aug 2013 #19
Yes and it looks like Georgie's little visit to the gun factory Marie Marie Aug 2013 #22
Oh Fuck Him! Maraya1969 Aug 2013 #21
I agree yeoman6987 Aug 2013 #46
I find the reactions here odd jberryhill Aug 2013 #26
The guy is a vile coward Isoldeblue Aug 2013 #27
So Zimmerman's Total Defense Costs Could Exceed $2 Million DallasNE Aug 2013 #28
Yeah, being an attorney is a license to steal Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #95
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #29
Maybe Florida will wake up when they have to add this to their budget! jwirr Aug 2013 #30
Most defendants in Florida are young minority men. branford Aug 2013 #32
so, you really care about minorites Skittles Aug 2013 #41
I care about the rights of all defendants, regardless of race. branford Aug 2013 #43
Is there a smiley for crickets? Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #114
LOLOL Skittles Aug 2013 #117
LOLOL Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #126
not NEARLY ENOUGH!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Skittles Aug 2013 #128
You rang the bell Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #129
hmmm blueridge3210 Aug 2013 #152
That was some reaction. Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #154
oh please...it is not "blind hatred" noiretextatique Aug 2013 #130
I was not referring to that law I was referring to the gun laws that encourage actions like those jwirr Aug 2013 #69
Florida has a balanced budget amendment Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #59
Savvy! blkmusclmachine Aug 2013 #38
What a clusterfuck this entire trial turned out to be NickB79 Aug 2013 #44
I guess Casey Anthony leftynyc Aug 2013 #48
Because the law only applies to extra-legal expenses (not attorney's fees) blueridge3210 Aug 2013 #52
As long as the morons leftynyc Aug 2013 #56
Respectfully, what about the law is ridiculous? branford Aug 2013 #66
Find me one minority defendent leftynyc Aug 2013 #74
Curbs on overzealous prosecutors are a good thing hack89 Aug 2013 #72
These are the same racists leftynyc Aug 2013 #76
The law as written is pretty straightforward. hack89 Aug 2013 #79
I agree the law is a good thing leftynyc Aug 2013 #81
Expenses are itemized and the body of law is generally straightforward. branford Aug 2013 #83
I have found that when fallible leftynyc Aug 2013 #85
That has not been my experience. Some huffing and puffing, but really just a formality. branford Aug 2013 #87
The funny thing is criticism of "overzealous prosecutors" never gets mentioned Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #93
I have lived a lot in the South hack89 Aug 2013 #108
or the more likely reality is that she intentionally threw the case Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #173
Actually, Casey Anthony was covered by the same law... kiawah Aug 2013 #109
Doesn't apply in her case since she was convicted - just not of murder. 24601 Aug 2013 #153
He's not getting any of it Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #63
Audacity and stupidity. andlor Aug 2013 #50
I wonder if the Zimmerman nuthuggers think California owes OJ a few hundred grand too. Snake Plissken Aug 2013 #51
The law is designed to keep the state Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #55
Does that cover the expensive tactical shotgun he was looking to buy the other day? Paladin Aug 2013 #58
It sucks, but it seems to be the law Bradical79 Aug 2013 #60
Good post Boom Sound 416 Aug 2013 #64
that's the law. I bet his lawyers can't wait to get paid and dump him before he strikes again. Sunlei Aug 2013 #73
Should the lawyer EC Aug 2013 #84
200k-300k is just the part the state has to pay. the bells, whistles, media campaigns..Z pays for Sunlei Aug 2013 #101
Well the jury found him innocent Marrah_G Aug 2013 #89
I wish people would not use the phrase "found him innocent". Nye Bevan Aug 2013 #94
juries cannot find people "innocent", they can only find "not guilty" slight difference. niyad Aug 2013 #102
That whole "personal responsibility" thing... tarheelsunc Aug 2013 #91
Huh? What about the George Zimmerman Legal Defense Fundf? KamaAina Aug 2013 #100
The incentive here is for Florida to stop prosecuting Deny and Shred Aug 2013 #105
Perhaps it should be taken from next year's DA budget Duer 157099 Aug 2013 #107
Florida, the turd dropping out of the South's butt. nt valerief Aug 2013 #113
That's so arrogant. RoccoR5955 Aug 2013 #142
Typical Teabilly: gov't can pay his bills, Myrina Aug 2013 #151
By the time it's all over, Z will be the governor of Florida ProudToBeBlueInRhody Aug 2013 #155
What, the NRA and his friends in the fire arms business won't help? Rebellious Republican Aug 2013 #166
Just when you think this story couldn't get any worse.. mountain grammy Aug 2013 #174
It doesn't pay his attorney's fee - lynne Aug 2013 #175
State would have paid for his defense is he took a public defender, but W T F Aug 2013 #183
That takes some brass ones. Walk away with your not-guilty verdict and SHUT UP, Georgie! (nt) ehrnst Aug 2013 #185
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»O'Mara: George Zimmerman ...»Reply #184