Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
Showing Original Post only (View all)DOJ Urges Supreme Court to Halt Warrantless Eavesdropping Challenge - WIRED [View all]
The Obama administration is urging the Supreme Court to halt a legal challenge weighing the constitutionality of a once-secret warrantless surveillance program targeting Americans communications that Congress eventually legalized in 2008.The FISA Amendments Act, (.pdf) the subject of the lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union and others, allows the government to electronically eavesdrop on Americans phone calls and e-mails without a probable-cause warrant so long as one of the parties to the communication is outside the United States, and is suspected of a link to terrorism.
The administration is asking the Supreme Court to review an appellate decision that said the nearly 4-year-old lawsuit could move forward. The government said the ACLU and a host of other groups dont have the legal standing to bring the case because they have no evidence they or their overseas clients are being targeted.
.............
The groups appealed to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, arguing that they often work with overseas dissidents who might be targets of the National Security Agency program. Instead of speaking with those people on the phone or through e-mails, the groups asserted that they have had to make expensive overseas trips in a bid to maintain attorney-client confidentiality. The plaintiffs, some of them journalists, also claim the 2008 legislation chills their speech, and violates their Fourth Amendment privacy rights.
MORE: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/02/scotus-fisa-amendments/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ Urges Supreme Court to Halt Warrantless Eavesdropping Challenge - WIRED [View all]
grahamhgreen
Feb 2012
OP
When that was passed, we were told it would be 'fixed' once Democrats won a majority and
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#1
Which is the same thing they said about health care, and what worries me about the new tax plan,
grahamhgreen
Feb 2012
#16
Thank you. If anything, that proves what people said at the time, it is far easier not to vote
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#19
Since the law is unconstitutional it does not matter what anyone can prove. It is illegal
Vincardog
Feb 2012
#3
Warrants aren't needed for collection on non-US persons not in US Jurisdiction. n/t
24601
Feb 2012
#9
So a second party who IS a citizen and IS on American soil has no standing either?
Occulus
Feb 2012
#13
Javert - who reconsidered his position and let Valjean go? Awww, you never finished the story, did
24601
Feb 2012
#20