Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AtheistCrusader

(33,982 posts)
35. Don't act stupid?
Thu Feb 23, 2012, 04:24 AM
Feb 2012
"Two LEO were inside the building at Columbine
Don't act stupid. You know this fact as well as I do. They chased Klebold and Harris, and could not manage to bring them down."



No, actually, SRO Neil Gardner exchanged gunfire with Harris outside the building (by the by, hitting no bystanders) and did not pursue him inside the school. Gardner was eating lunch in his patrol car, at the far end of the building when it started. That was one of the main, problematic findings of the governor's report on the whole mess: they set up a perimeter, and did not engage and pursue the shooters. The main force of non-SWAT officers arrived minutes later, none of them pursuing the suspects into the building until after the two suspects were already dead.

When you fire a fucking pistol, from 60 yards away, at a person shooting back at you, you are pretty damn likely to miss.

Likewise for Deputy Paul Smoker and two other Denver officers that fired at the pair FROM OUTSIDE the building, while the suspects returned fire from a window.

Maybe you should calm down a bit and check your facts, before you go off on someone, when you are wrong. The SRO's didn't go inside, and didn't pursue. Their only contact with the shooters was at range that you pretty much can't expect a hit with a pistol anyway, under combat conditions. Most people are hard pressed to score a lethal hit on a FULL SIZED human silouette at 25 yards. These officers had a slight advantage over the CPL holder in Arizona, in that they could SEE someone to shoot at, but they did not pursue, as it was against department policy, they didn't hit their targets, didn't go inside after them, and also, contrary to your assumption, didn't hit any bystanders, even though they opened fire on suspects who were standing in front of an inhabited school.

http://www.state.co.us/columbine/Columbine_20Report_WEB.pdf

Now that we've cleared that up.

I promised you two CPL holder's saving lives.

Mark Allen Wilson, armed only with a handgun, engaged a shooter with a rifle on the Tyler, Tx courthouse steps. He stopped the shooter from murdering his own son. Unfortunately the shooter was wearing a bullet proof vest and flak jacket, so he was not killed. He returned fire at Wilson, and the two were engaged long enough for more officers to arrive on scene. Wilson was killed. One life, or more, saved. (Posthumous congressional commendation)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tyler_courthouse_shooting

A local (for me) shooting at the Tacoma mall. Brandon Mckown confronted the shooter, Maldonado, with his pistol at low-ready, and ordered him to drop his rifle. (McKown probably should have just shot him on sight, he was behind the curve already, with a pistol against a rifle) Maldonado opted to gun down Mckown instead, having the advantage of not giving a shit about human life, and just blazing away. The encounter delayed Maldonado, no one else was shot during the rampage, after McKown opposed him. Another CPL holder was in the mall as well, but did not fire, because he didn't have a clear shot.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_mall_shooting

By all means, proffer up some supporting evidence for your bullshit meme of CPL holders gunning down innocents in returning fire. I'll wait.

I don't know what CPL holders you know 'intimidating' or 'brandishing' as you claim, I don't know a single license holder that doesn't know damn well that we are held to a higher standard than joe citizen, and we don't fuck around playing show and tell. As you can see from my above examples, we can and have had positive impacts on active shooter situations, rarely if ever make the situation worse, and some have paid the ultimate price doing it.

There are of course, better examples of active shooters being reduced to room temp by CPL holders, but I think these two examples really put the lie to your meme about empty bravado, recklessness, etc. These guys went up against very bad odds, likely to lose, and one dead, the other crippled for life, they still made a very positive impact on the situation.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Ho hum otohara Feb 2012 #1
Sure is. Those kind of things seem to be happening quite regularly. LisaL Feb 2012 #2
I know it may seem that way, but actually its happening less and less. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #3
What stats? LisaL Feb 2012 #6
You used to not hear about all of them. AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #7
That's the truth. sofa king Feb 2012 #22
Not actually true Spider Jerusalem Feb 2012 #26
c'mon everyone remembers brenda spencer pitohui Feb 2012 #36
The FBI UCR cleanhippie Feb 2012 #10
I'm sure the victims and their families are reassured. Loudly Feb 2012 #11
It's like too much free speech for ordinary citizens. Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #14
I can understand your emotional response, but the fact is that gun crime has been decreasing cleanhippie Feb 2012 #16
Tell that to the five dead people Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #17
Tell that to the hundreds of people saved cleanhippie Feb 2012 #18
"Hundreds of people saved"? You're funny, aren't you? Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #19
I can only agree with you that in the here and now LanternWaste Feb 2012 #23
Columbine? Do tell. AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #24
Two LEO were inside the building at Columbine Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #27
Source please. AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #30
I'm not doing your research Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #32
Don't act stupid? AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #35
"I'll wait." ellisonz Feb 2012 #37
That's nice, I replied before that post was hidden. AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #38
... ellisonz Feb 2012 #39
Not my problem. AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #41
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #25
My facts are as valid as yours Missy Vixen Feb 2012 #28
Emotional, anecdotal evidence are not facts. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #29
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #31
Way to go. When you can no longer support your argument, resort to personal attacks. cleanhippie Feb 2012 #34
I live in Norcross wilt the stilt Feb 2012 #4
It's a Korean sauna-massage-body scrub establishment, with facilities for men and women, apparently. MADem Feb 2012 #5
"Health Spa"? Yeah, honey, I was at a "health spa" jberryhill Feb 2012 #8
Who really gives a fuck? Hugabear Feb 2012 #12
I can't imagine the relation between... jberryhill Feb 2012 #13
You know who typically owns and manages those types of establishments, right? Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #15
It is a health and beauty spa obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #20
It was family owned and totatlly legtimate. n/t RebelOne Feb 2012 #40
Is it a real spa or one of those Happy Ending places?? Blue_Tires Feb 2012 #9
It is a real spa obamanut2012 Feb 2012 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author cleanhippie Feb 2012 #33
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»5 dead in shooting at hea...»Reply #35