Latest Breaking News

Sanddog42

(117 posts)

56. 50 major "sites"

Reply to ConcernedCanuk (Reply #28)

Sat Sep 7, 2013, 01:38 PM

Sep 2013

Not "cities" per se.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Pentagon Is Ordered to Expand Potential Targets in Syria With a Focus on Forces [View all] Hissyspit Sep 2013 OP

Wow, losing the vote plus the argument and doubling down. dkf Sep 2013 #1

Will Obama go down in history for handing Syria to al Qaeda on a silver platter? David__77 Sep 2013 #4

Was Syria ever Obama's to swilton Sep 2013 #40

That's my point. He should not do so. David__77 Sep 2013 #46

We did not lose votes due to the Libya intervention. Tx4obama Sep 2013 #6

Losing votes is the least of the bad outcomes possible. [n/t] Maedhros Sep 2013 #8

For the Inner-Party that is all that matters. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #9

Root, root, root for the home team... [n/t] Maedhros Sep 2013 #14

No...speaking about how this vote looks to be going. dkf Sep 2013 #16

Oh? Ash_F Sep 2013 #50

So they are planning an even bigger war for al Qaeda. David__77 Sep 2013 #2

Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #11

Death's head? What in the world is that? dkf Sep 2013 #17

You know, I don't think it was just the acid. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #18

I have definitely not heard that before. dkf Sep 2013 #20

Maybe this will help. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #24

He was in the same secret society as Bush and Stimson, the guy pushing the Hiroshima jakeXT Sep 2013 #25

Obama is getting his advice from Gen. Jack D. Ripper again nt msongs Sep 2013 #3

AKA Samantha Power arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #12

We must protect our bodily fluids. Kablooie Sep 2013 #62

Well here we go. They are already expanding their so-called "limited response." totodeinhere Sep 2013 #5

I agree Robbins Sep 2013 #7

Long as it doesnt include a ground invasion and occupation forces its still a limited cstanleytech Sep 2013 #32

So they can bomb Syria into the Stone Age and it's still limited? totodeinhere Sep 2013 #33

Yes of course because we all know that is what is being proposed!! cstanleytech Sep 2013 #37

Of course I was using a bit of hyperbole, but based upon news reports it does look totodeinhere Sep 2013 #43

I dont think Obama is proposing a repeat of the Battle of London either cstanleytech Sep 2013 #45

As long as itS not on the scale of D-day, it could still be called limited daleo Sep 2013 #47

Which is why I believe waiting to see what the proposal is a good idea for us all to do. cstanleytech Sep 2013 #52

Waiting for facts is best. daleo Sep 2013 #57

Oh I agree with you there. nt cstanleytech Sep 2013 #58

Okay, this is starting to look like going to war with Syria. And what happens if we "win"? Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #10

If we win defacto7 Sep 2013 #13

Obama needs to let Congress convince him to walk away from this. Comrade Grumpy Sep 2013 #15

A salute to you, Comrade Grumpy! arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #21

But what is winning? fasttense Sep 2013 #27

Brazen, blood-thirsty arrogance! Alamuti Lotus Sep 2013 #19

Absolutely. We've got to shut this shit down, NOW. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #22

For that kind of money Turbineguy Sep 2013 #23

Can we please move on from the act of war yes or no argument now? Celefin Sep 2013 #26

Holy shit - 50 cities wasn't enough, eh? ConcernedCanuk Sep 2013 #28

"that Obama wants to "trump" Bush." dixiegrrrrl Sep 2013 #55

50 major "sites" Sanddog42 Sep 2013 #56

The Obama admin has gone mad. Arrowhead2k1 Sep 2013 #29

Many said that after he was re-elected he'd be free to act the way he really wanted to FiveGoodMen Sep 2013 #41

DU used to be a site where the majority would know that the JoePhilly Sep 2013 #30

So is WWIII now the threshold? As long as we don't go that far it's OK? totodeinhere Sep 2013 #34

You do know that we have war plans for both Russia and China, right? JoePhilly Sep 2013 #35

The difference is that those other things you listed are just plans. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #36

Which of those plans does he intend to actually use? JoePhilly Sep 2013 #38

We don't know exactly which plan he will use because it keeps changing from day to day. totodeinhere Sep 2013 #39

You should take these plans seriously daleo Sep 2013 #48

DU DOES know that. And we know that each time there was a 'limited' strike, lots of people died. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #54

Mission Creep even before the first missile is fired! workinclasszero Sep 2013 #31

B2s, B52s, from the US, will drop glide bombs on quadrature Sep 2013 #42

Nobody mentions the hundreds murdered by chemical weapons, or our promise that these crimes against appacom Sep 2013 #44

Pride is one of the Seven Deadly Sins. nt Hissyspit Sep 2013 #49

Apparently it is usually accompanied by wilful ignorance and a desire to be an ostrich. (n/t) Nihil Sep 2013 #51

Amen philosslayer Sep 2013 #60

Wow. "Limited strike" out the window even before a vote. DirkGently Sep 2013 #53

Here is a question for you all. cstanleytech Sep 2013 #59

Peace is a fleeting idea in that part of the world Harmony Blue Sep 2013 #63

So how do they now that Assad is preparing to use chemical weapons again? Kablooie Sep 2013 #61