Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Latest Breaking News
In reply to the discussion: Israel Dismisses Warnings From US About Attacking Iran [View all]Douglas Carpenter
(20,226 posts)37. Panetta & Pentagon admits their "bunker buster" bombs cannot penetrate Iran's underground facilitie
Haaretz: The futility of attacking Iran By Reuven Pedatzur
Published 03:42 09.02.12
Senior American defense officials told The Wall Street Journal that even the largest bomb in the hands of the American military, the one known as the "bunker buster", is not able to penetrate and destroy those of the Iranian nuclear installations that are buried deep underground. Panetta admitted that the Americans do not possess the means of penetrating facilities like the underground uranium enrichment plant at Fordow, near Qum. This is where the problem lies. Some of the nuclear facilities in Iran, especially those that are critical for the continuation of its nuclear program activities, are located deep below the surface and protected by reinforced concrete fortifications. This makes the task of destroying them almost completely impossible. In Israel, those involved have ignored the limitations of these bombs that are supposed to annihilate the nuclear sites; but ignoring this will not solve the operational problem that those planning the attack will have to deal with.
If Israeli Air Force planes succeed in reaching the targets and in dropping bombs on them with great accuracy, but they are nevertheless not destroyed, this would pose questions about the justification of a military operation. If those critical sites are not annihilated, the Iranian nuclear program will be postponed only for a relatively short period.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/the-futility-of-attacking-iran-1.411840
.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oh Geez! Great minds think alike. When I read the OP I thought, " Big talk for a country
truth2power
Feb 2012
#42
I think you are thinking of droopy dog, they are not one in the same are they? nope.
lonestarnot
Feb 2012
#22
Lieberman's photo should go into Wikipedia, as the definitive illustration of the "shit-eating grin"
Brettongarcia
Feb 2012
#36
i fully agree that Iran is no threat, in and of themselves, with or without nukes
flexnor
Feb 2012
#47
We would have to "sit it out" - gasoline would be $8 a gallon - if you could find it.
jpak
Feb 2012
#54
there is absolutely no way than any Middle Eastern government can admit openly that they allowed
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2012
#38
No problem: through Syria which is busy now; then Iraq with no air defense; then hit Iran.
Brettongarcia
Feb 2012
#41
Panetta & Pentagon admits their "bunker buster" bombs cannot penetrate Iran's underground facilitie
Douglas Carpenter
Feb 2012
#37
IMHO, any first strike on Iran, would almost certainly backfire badly on Israel.
AverageJoe90
Feb 2012
#45