Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

Showing Original Post only (View all)

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Wed Sep 11, 2013, 01:32 PM Sep 2013

UN team finds no proof on chemical weapons [View all]

Source: Agence France-Presse

United Nations investigators have listed a wide range of crimes against humanity and war crimes committed in Syria, but provided no conclusion on the issue of chemical weapons use.

<snip>

The report does not address the period after July 15, which includes the August 21 suspected chemical attack on civilians near Damascus that sparked international outrage and could still lead to US-led military strikes, despite intense diplomatic efforts to avoid them.

In Wednesday's statement though, the four-member commission led by Brazilian Paulo Sergio Pinheiro insisted on the "need for accountability, both to bring to justice those who used them (chemical weapons, if confirmed) ... and to deter anyone else from using these abhorrent methods of warfare."

<snip>

"Failure to bring about a political settlement has allowed the conflict not only to deepen in its intransigence but also to widen, expanding to new actors and to new, previously unimaginable crimes," the commission said.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/un-team-finds-no-proof-on-chemical-weapons-20130911-2tkv1.html

32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"The report does not address the period after July 15, which includes the August 21 suspected chemic bananas Sep 2013 #1
Yeah. And the terms of reference of the current UN inspection/inquiry Ghost Dog Sep 2013 #30
Kind of a reach on that title sharp_stick Sep 2013 #2
Thanks. I was wondering: "WTF? This can't be THE UN report we've all been waiting for" nt 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #4
That's what I thought when I saw it. nt bananas Sep 2013 #8
Yes, A Big Disappointment DallasNE Sep 2013 #17
Unfortunately that title sharp_stick Sep 2013 #18
An LBN article will be locked if it doesn't use the exact same title. bananas Sep 2013 #20
I have brought this up in the hosts forum Turborama Sep 2013 #25
This Shouldn't Be A Get Out Of Jail Free Card DallasNE Sep 2013 #28
Hello? It won't be locked if you clarify headlines in parenthesis when necessary. Turborama Sep 2013 #31
what a crock. "abhorrent methods of warfare." ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2013 #3
Paron me sir, but do you mind terribly if I perforate you with this lovely piece of shrapnel, propel AtheistCrusader Sep 2013 #11
kaboom still means dead. ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2013 #12
Crimes against humanity and war crimes are particularly abhorrent. bananas Sep 2013 #19
Yeah, the war rules at sea are almost remarkable. ChairmanAgnostic Sep 2013 #21
Addressing space warfare is an important issue. bananas Sep 2013 #29
Is there a method of warfare that is not abhorrent? mahannah Sep 2013 #5
dropping Love Bombs maxsolomon Sep 2013 #10
Thanks for the deliberately misleading title. pnwmom Sep 2013 #6
Had to follow LBN rules, unfortunately. bananas Sep 2013 #7
Okay. Maybe it would have been better off in GD, with a different title. pnwmom Sep 2013 #9
That headline is appearing on news outlets worldwide. bananas Sep 2013 #15
Bullshit title. SunSeeker Sep 2013 #13
So people would know it doesn't include the August attack. bananas Sep 2013 #24
So, the jury is still out. grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #14
Yes. nt bananas Sep 2013 #16
The earlier supposed attacks were widely blamed on the rebels NickB79 Sep 2013 #22
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2013 #23
golly progressoid Sep 2013 #26
It would have been better to have used the Reuters article which has a better headline, see below Tx4obama Sep 2013 #27
It's funny that this article ruffles feathers. David__77 Sep 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»UN team finds no proof on...