Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celefin

(532 posts)
16. Indeed. Plus even if you 'C'apture the 'C'arbon... the 'S' renders the approach unusable
Thu Sep 12, 2013, 09:24 AM
Sep 2013

There has been extensive debate on that... from injecting it into the deep sea to storing it in shale formations or shut oil wells.
They all carry enormous risks, from extremely rapid ocean acidification to disruption of the food chain; the geological formations approach is insecure, a large scale accidental release of a CO2 'geyser' has the potential to kill off everything on the surface in a very large area... and then there are the myriad of unsolved technical problems AND the very large energy costs associated.

It's a total non-starter but has been cited by politicians all over the spectrum as THE solution to our climate problems.
Pure smoke and mirrors.

Indeed kick the can down the road. It's infuriating... especially that most of the voters believe this rubbish because it has been treated as 'fact for a decade now. Incidentally a decade where there has been no progress on CCS.

Anyway, thanks for your reply

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Got to love how their headline makes it all about Obama dballance Sep 2013 #1
Of course! He's Superman, didn't you know. Everything is his fault, even when Rethugs Liberal_Stalwart71 Sep 2013 #8
Love how you can't stand. :) It's about the environment and I understand Cha Sep 2013 #9
AUTISM. proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #2
This makes us more dependent on gas fired energy. The oil industry says thanks. Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #3
Economic disadvantage? Public health, AUTISM. proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #4
Then it would stand to reason that Autism would have reached its zenith years ago when coal was used Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #6
Good points, obvious question, not my field / I don't have an explanation, I suspect others do. proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #7
We have a whole forum on Energy issues if you want to get up to speed on it Kolesar Sep 2013 #5
There's a lot of cross-ownership between coal and oil companies daleo Sep 2013 #11
K & R SunSeeker Sep 2013 #10
If it came down to coal or nuke power plants though I would pick coal ones. cstanleytech Sep 2013 #12
US exports of coal are at an all time high. joshcryer Sep 2013 #13
Funny how CCS nowadays is treated as a commonplace technology Celefin Sep 2013 #14
Funny how CCS is even being treated as a real-world technology that works - it doesn't. Nihil Sep 2013 #15
Indeed. Plus even if you 'C'apture the 'C'arbon... the 'S' renders the approach unusable Celefin Sep 2013 #16
"Pure smoke and mirrors" - exactly so! Nihil Sep 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Obama Said to Ban New Coa...»Reply #16