Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Latest Breaking News

(33,311 posts)

8. Isn't this pretty much codifying the NY Times v. US case?

Thu Sep 12, 2013, 10:16 PM

Sep 2013

Whistleblower could remain anonymous, thanks to brave reporters in the media.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Senate Panel Approves Measure Defining A Journalist, OKs Media Shield Legislation [View all] Purveyor Sep 2013 OP

Related. proverbialwisdom Sep 2013 #1

+1 nt Earth_First Sep 2013 #2

Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner. Scuba Sep 2013 #6

Isn't this pretty much codifying the NY Times v. US case? alp227 Sep 2013 #8

Then I hope this bill DOES get filibustered alp227 Sep 2013 #11

Bull. A journalist already has a definition!!! Here: grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #5

Schumer had 19 cosponsors - alp227 Sep 2013 #9