Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
5. Did you leave out the paragraph that said the found evidence had been handled/moved prior to
Mon Sep 16, 2013, 06:05 PM
Sep 2013

the inspectors arrival by accident? also if the writing is Cyrillic why aren't the numbers?

here is the entire document, appendix 5 is the salient part and what is partially cited by the OP, leaving out the mentioned paragraph, sorry it is a scribed document and I can not copy/paste the paragraph I mentioned, or I would do so

http://www.scribd.com/doc/168606795/U-N-Report-on-Chemical-Attack-in-Syria

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Heh. n/t Benton D Struckcheon Sep 2013 #1
A compelling case has been made that Sarin was used and all the implications point at the government Agnosticsherbet Sep 2013 #2
No. The 140mm rockets killed about 100 people - the rest were killed elsewhere by improvised rockets leveymg Sep 2013 #13
We shall see. This report suggests that it is rather certain that the Assad government used JDPriestly Sep 2013 #15
Not if the CIA suppied rebels have been involved in it brisas2k Sep 2013 #17
That remains a possibility, but is less likely than it was before the report. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #18
Only a relatively small number were military rockets observed to come from the direction of gov't leveymg Sep 2013 #19
Some other major inconsistencies and misrepresentations in this matter: leveymg Sep 2013 #21
There is no John2 Sep 2013 #3
Ah yes, the "nuh-uh!" and "NO U" rebuttals. Classics of the genre. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #4
This is the one who keep asking : Sand Wind Sep 2013 #6
Your loyalty to Assad would be touching if geek tragedy Sep 2013 #22
Did you leave out the paragraph that said the found evidence had been handled/moved prior to azurnoir Sep 2013 #5
Well before the Damascus gas attack took place . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #7
Samantha Power is the worst. arewenotdemo Sep 2013 #10
Samantha Power . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #24
Wasn't the impression I got from her books, but hey. (nt) Posteritatis Sep 2013 #37
Every hunmanitarian crisis I have seen her comment on . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #55
She is just jizzing in her pants at the thought of invading Syria AngryAmish Sep 2013 #65
It would be great if you linked sources for that. leveymg Sep 2013 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author another_liberal Sep 2013 #27
I relented . . . another_liberal Sep 2013 #33
Does this mean that the UN will bomb Syria and announce Assad a criminal? lovuian Sep 2013 #8
That could be the best strategy of all. Sand Wind Sep 2013 #9
Will You Be one of the First In Wolf Frankula Sep 2013 #11
Sorry...I'd believe very little of what she says along with Susan Rice. KoKo Sep 2013 #12
+! 2banon Sep 2013 #66
Now this is the way to handle such situations. JDPriestly Sep 2013 #14
what is very damning is the fact the UN team states unequivocally that the evidence azurnoir Sep 2013 #16
Russia's quick response to offer an agreement suggests to me that Russia knows very well JDPriestly Sep 2013 #20
There is another explanation for why Russia AND Assad moved quickly to give up CWs: loss of control leveymg Sep 2013 #25
Why not admit to that? joshcryer Sep 2013 #36
That was also a red-line, remember? leveymg Sep 2013 #44
I don't buy it. joshcryer Sep 2013 #46
It would cause an uproar and goes so far against the conventional narrative it could set off leveymg Sep 2013 #49
How heavy is the Al Qaeda presence in those contested areas? Uncle Joe Sep 2013 #63
it's part of the UN inspection teams report azurnoir Sep 2013 #30
The Kremlin's talking points have gone out apparently nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #23
and you're claiming the UN team is quoting them? azurnoir Sep 2013 #28
Obfuscate away. All evidence points to the regime. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #29
I was citing the UN inspection teamns report so you're cherry picking that? n/t azurnoir Sep 2013 #31
You claimed it was damning that the scene had been disturbed geek tragedy Sep 2013 #32
The UN team said the evidence had been handled/moved prior to their arrival azurnoir Sep 2013 #39
No they didn't. That's your attempt to spin their words to give cover to your boy Assad.nt geek tragedy Sep 2013 #52
My 'boy' Assad? just where do you get that from? azurnoir Sep 2013 #53
You sound exactly like his defense lawyer will if they ever get him out of power alive. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #54
you appear to say that being anti-war means being anti-US or something azurnoir Sep 2013 #56
The facts released by the UN establish that it was the regime geek tragedy Sep 2013 #57
The report established nothing of the sort that was not the mission of the UN team azurnoir Sep 2013 #58
So you, Putin, and Larry "whitey tape" Johnson say. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #59
show us where the UN's mission was to establish who used Sarin azurnoir Sep 2013 #60
It was not allowed to pursue that line. geek tragedy Sep 2013 #61
the hypothesis is your very own azurnoir Sep 2013 #62
They did not say that. joshcryer Sep 2013 #35
it does not say that it says the evidence was moved /handled prior to the teams inspections azurnoir Sep 2013 #38
It does not say that munitions used as evidence were moved! joshcryer Sep 2013 #40
That is NOT the statement from the UN report you made up that entire statement azurnoir Sep 2013 #41
I typed it EXACTLY as your link, page 22. joshcryer Sep 2013 #42
OMG I wish I could say I can't believe the dishonesty in your statement azurnoir Sep 2013 #43
Admit it, you got caught misrepresenting the evidence. joshcryer Sep 2013 #45
you got caught attempting to spin it azurnoir Sep 2013 #47
the munitions weren't moved, you lied joshcryer Sep 2013 #48
now your just making that up what exactly was the UN using as evidence azurnoir Sep 2013 #51
The pictures show mostly whole munitions! joshcryer Sep 2013 #64
Married to Cass Sunstein Aerows Sep 2013 #34
You may not be aware of this, but geek tragedy Sep 2013 #50
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Statement by Ambassador S...»Reply #5